Investor · Shelton, WA · Member since 2017 · 6k+ posts · 6k+ votes
4y
For me it is a red flag and requires extra screening. Why would a sane person with a very healthy credit score want to do that? In some states you are not allowed to accept that much up front. You accept it and it is taxed in the current year LL books are on a cash basis. Let's say for some reason you are asked to pay some of it back-then what.
Generally when an applicant waves money under a LL's nose they want you to limit your screening and not uncover their serious warts. Maybe the property was not for her, it was for someone else who is now cooking meth in your house. But you don't see the need to inspect because you got money up front.
I would not rule the applicant out. I would screen them a lot more closely than otherwise.
Screen like your life depends on it, because it does!
Real Estate Agent · Temple, TX · Member since 2022 · 1k+ posts · 700 votes
4y
Eh, im not sure but if it was me, I would take it lol. I'd put aside about 10-20% of in case of an eviction but if their credit score is that good, I doubt they would want an eviction to ruin it.
Investor · Shelton, WA · Member since 2017 · 6k+ posts · 6k+ votes
4y
For me it is a red flag and requires extra screening. Why would a sane person with a very healthy credit score want to do that? In some states you are not allowed to accept that much up front. You accept it and it is taxed in the current year LL books are on a cash basis. Let's say for some reason you are asked to pay some of it back-then what.
Generally when an applicant waves money under a LL's nose they want you to limit your screening and not uncover their serious warts. Maybe the property was not for her, it was for someone else who is now cooking meth in your house. But you don't see the need to inspect because you got money up front.
I would not rule the applicant out. I would screen them a lot more closely than otherwise.
Screen like your life depends on it, because it does!
Investor · Boulder, CO · Member since 2017 · 304 posts · 347 votes
4y
Great question @Berdine Ramos! I'm gonna echo the sentiment on finding out exactly why this applicant is so willing to pay upfront? Is your market super hot? I mean, I had some applicants want to give me a lump sum of cash but it was due to explainable circumstances like a housing/rental shortage or extended, out of country travel.
Get landlord references. And what does this person do for employment? Have you verified?
I'd keep a reasonable reason for you to visit the property, say by Feb 1 to change the furnace filter and make sure you don't have a grow house or something along those lines;) I see you are in CA, make sure you are covered in your lease for grows, illegal substance, etc.
Rental Property Investor · Laurel, MD · Member since 2016 · 378 posts · 382 votes
4y
Yes, it's a big red flag! Plus you cannot accept it in Maryland. Maryland law clearly states that you can only hold 2 months worth of rent, security deposit and last months rent. Anything more and you open yourself up to being sued.
For me it is a red flag and requires extra screening. Why would a sane person with a very healthy credit score want to do that? In some states you are not allowed to accept that much up front. You accept it and it is taxed in the current year LL books are on a cash basis. Let's say for some reason you are asked to pay some of it back-then what.
Generally when an applicant waves money under a LL's nose they want you to limit your screening and not uncover their serious warts. Maybe the property was not for her, it was for someone else who is now cooking meth in your house. But you don't see the need to inspect because you got money up front.
I would not rule the applicant out. I would screen them a lot more closely than otherwise.
Screen like your life depends on it, because it does!
Huh, im a newer investor and I would have never thought of this. That's....a very good point
Property Manager · Baltimore, MD · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
3y
I don't understand all the fuss. I would still put the tenant through my normal screening process regardless of their ability/willingness to pay up front, but aside from any local laws prohibiting it this can only benefit the landlord.
Someone mentioned that the applicant could be a front for another intended occupant, but thats always the case and your lease should be clear that unauthorized occupants are prohibited.
Screen the tenant. If they have acceptable eviction/credit/criminal history then take their money and be thankful you don't have to collect rent for the next 12 months.
Investor · Manteca, CA · Member since 2017 · 1k+ posts · 2k+ votes
3y
HUGE red flag for me..... prospective tenants throwing around big $$ up front is often an attempt to blind you with cash and have you overlook something that will bite you in the *** later.
Occasionally you may get a real solid reason, but most are hiding something... HUGE red flag to me.
Some states its illegal to do.
If you consider it, I would screen them 5x harder and want serious verified references
Investor · Sacramento, CA · Member since 2020 · 33 posts · 19 votes
3y
I would not take it. Sounds like the applicant is a "professional" tenant. A lot of states are only allowing deposit that is worth of 2 months rent. There is a chance that this tenant might request it back after they move in. There could be different reasons. One is already mentioned is to "bypass" screening. The another reason could be that they want to move in ask for it back and you are obligated to return it. Renter will stop paying. Usually people will the low credit scores do that so I would make sure the credit score is actually accurate. My gut feeling telling me that somehow their credit score is not 790 and they are trying to distract you by offering a lot of money up front.
Investor · Washington, DC · Member since 2018 · 93 posts · 54 votes
3y
As others have said just screen well but it's not an automatic no. I've accepted a full year before for a group of students. Their payment was coming from their loan. Different circumstances.
Lender · Rosenberg, TX · Member since 2022 · 286 posts · 130 votes
3y
Have yall ever thought that the prospective tenant might be offering this as an incentive, they may think this would secure the lease as it is prepaid for an entire year.
Rental Property Investor · Baltimore · Member since 2022 · 26 posts · 24 votes
3y
I had tenant like this. He would pay 6-8 months of rent at a time. Never a problem. Can’t always assume the worst. Just screen them as you would anyone.
Contractor/Investor/Consultant · San Diego / Phoenix · Member since 2021 · 12k+ posts · 15k+ votes
3y
This is just so suspicious.....why in the world would someone give up that much money and let it sit, rather than have it invested and making money? At the very least, this shows that the tenant has zero money sense. That alone is reason to say no.
And never worry more about getting your place rented than getting a good solid renter, Never. It's not worth any risk....
If you like the tenant otherwise, then just have them sign a normal lease and pay you normally....
Investor · Narragansett, RI · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 4k+ votes
3y
Ask them why? The money would have to be returned if they don't stay. There are reasons I would not look at this negatively but I might consider it a red flag if they do it to try to get you to overlook another deficiency. On the other hand someone who is looking for a while or works down the street and wants this apartment in particular might make this kind of offer. Someone who must keep kids in a certain school district, etc. Not all motives are bad.
We have a rental opening up Nov 1, and have one applicant with a credit score of 790 offering to pay the full years rent up front. Red flag?
Thank You
You and I live in the same general area. Paying up front has become more common in this part of Southern California. I also agree with the advice that you proceed with caution while screening the prospect. But I think this is normal now for LA/OC. I was helping a client look for rentals in Irvine a few months ago and many of the renters we were up against had the ability to pay 1 year up front (approx $60,000).
We have a rental opening up Nov 1, and have one applicant with a credit score of 790 offering to pay the full years rent up front. Red flag?
Thank You
Not necessarily a red flag, but it's not a good idea to accept rent in advance. If you need to evict for another reason, it can really complicate the matter. If they can afford to pay an entire year in advance, certainly they can budget for montly payments.
I don't understand all the fuss. I would still put the tenant through my normal screening process regardless of their ability/willingness to pay up front, but aside from any local laws prohibiting it this can only benefit the landlord.
Someone mentioned that the applicant could be a front for another intended occupant, but thats always the case and your lease should be clear that unauthorized occupants are prohibited.
Screen the tenant. If they have acceptable eviction/credit/criminal history then take their money and be thankful you don't have to collect rent for the next 12 months.
I am the same way, 790 credit score, good job, on year rent
what is the problem ???
Dont rent it to somebody who does not meet your requirements but why would not rent it to somebody who fits into your requirements anyway...
You would rent it same person if he/she pays you one month but if they pay you 12 months it is a problem.