It's called contract assignment - they're selling YOU the right to take their position in a P&S contract. It's a common business practice, though often done wrong by wholesalers.
They've entered into a P&S contract with a seller. This gives them "equitable interest". They then can exercise an option to assign their position in that contract to someone else, preferably with the seller's knowledge and permission. As long as everyone agrees, there's usually no problem.
The wholesaler assigns their position in the contract to an end buyer. The end buyer closes with the seller and pays the assignment fee out of their (the buyer's) funds at closing.
In some states which are wholesale averse, it's often necessary to do what's called a "back-to-back" closing. The wholesaler completes the purchase from the seller using transactional funding, then sells to you when that closing is complete. The wholesaler takes profit from a small markup agreed to with the end-buyer in course of negotiations.
Fund Manager · Wayne, PA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
9y
Because they're selling you the right to the agreement of sale to purchase the property, by assignment transfer, not actually selling you the house,
Anyway, hope this helps,
Best,
Dave
It's called contract assignment - they're selling YOU the right to take their position in a P&S contract. It's a common business practice, though often done wrong by wholesalers.
They've entered into a P&S contract with a seller. This gives them "equitable interest". They then can exercise an option to assign their position in that contract to someone else, preferably with the seller's knowledge and permission. As long as everyone agrees, there's usually no problem.
The wholesaler assigns their position in the contract to an end buyer. The end buyer closes with the seller and pays the assignment fee out of their (the buyer's) funds at closing.
In some states which are wholesale averse, it's often necessary to do what's called a "back-to-back" closing. The wholesaler completes the purchase from the seller using transactional funding, then sells to you when that closing is complete. The wholesaler takes profit from a small markup agreed to with the end-buyer in course of negotiations.
Investor · Chandler, AZ · Member since 2015 · 409 posts · 214 votes
9y
in most states the transaction of wholesaling is illegal
the wholesaler-person who has the contract does not have the funds to purchase the property making it a illegal transaction
when it is assigned-sold to the buyer for profits with no intention of being a backup purchaser this is also illegal
at closing- when the two contracts are closed the wholesaler is responsible for the gain on both transactions of the property- if not doing this, the transaction is considered evasion by the wholesaler
the wholesaler is responsible for the selling cost and the purchasing cost-6%- three to buying agent and three to listing agent
legally you cannot commit fraud to make a real estate deal
Contractor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2016 · 267 posts · 144 votes
9y
This topic has consistently frustrated me because I've never actually seen an attorney weigh in and I always hear it both ways.
I'ld like to pit @Stanley Parsley and @David Dachtera in a discussion to see why the differences of opinion but I won't do that for sake of keeping the peace.
Wholesalers tend to "sell the property" rather than their position in the contract: "I have a xBR / xBa house ... great deal" instead of "I have a contract accepted on (property), it's a great deal, I'll sell you my position in the contract" or "... I'll assign the contract to you".
By doing it wrong, they're raising the hackles of everyone from the NAR to the local and state government officials. By doing wrong they are, literally, "acting as an unlicensed agent / broker".
They're also doing something arguably illegal: they have the right to sell their position in the contract. They do NOT have the right to sell the property itself.
"It's not what you say, it's how you say it".
THAT is what prompts legislation to prevent contract assignments in real estate, an otherwise perfectly normal, legal and common business practice.
What Stan is talking about sounds like a hybrid between contract assignment and "back-to-back" closings. What he's describing is not wholesaling. I'm not sure what it is.
Contractor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2016 · 267 posts · 144 votes
9y
@David Dachtera I apolagize if what I said sounded aggresive and agitated. Not my intentions.
Thank you for clarifying. As I am wholesaling and still new to it I am very aware of the language other wholesalers use like "we will buy your house cash" when nearly all of them never do so and could never do so, they just find another buyer. That subtle deciet bothers me.
I will take your counsel and make sure my business falls under legality and honesty.
Developer · Boston, MA · Member since 2017 · 125 posts · 137 votes
9y
I agree with everything @David Dachtera just said. I have done a ton wholesale deals over the last couple years and it is exactly a case of I have created a contract and I am selling the contract more often than not for a small premium. Never once have I led with I got a deal at 123 45th St- its a three bedroom three bath unit anyone interested. Instead I go my network of investors who I have worked with an said I have an option or signed agreement to buy a property I got it at x% off any interest? Or if there are delicate laws I will take the property on myself and then sell an lease to sell option to an investor over the next year. Every problem has a solution just a question of how creative you are looking to be with it.
Real Estate Broker · Naples, FL · Member since 2013 · 9k+ posts · 6k+ votes
9y
I think there needs to be a distinction between "wholesaling" and flipping. When you see the term "wholesale" there are some that are referring to flipping and other to contract assignment. There are not many legal ways to assign contracts in FL with the exception of being licensed. I am aware of a local case where a "wholesaler" put a property under contract with no intention to close. They took through several "inspectors" who were actually people the unlicensed broker was attempting to sell the house to. It is now going to court. The owner signed a contract and then failed to close. The unlicensed broker just filed a suit. The defendants attorney is filing a counter suit for FRAUD, FDUPTA, and brokering without a license in violation of 475.43. That is the problem with most of these people--they don't have funds and have no intention of purchasing. Many owners are victimized by these scammers.
There is probably one ONE way to LEGALLY assign a contract in ANY jurisdiction, and it's spelled out in the law. I'm sure it's NOT limited to real estate, but encompasses any and all areas of business, whether that be assigning a contract to purchase a business, a piece of real property, a piece of industrial equipment, items of personal property, etc.
I hate to have to say it, but education is ALWAYS key. See my profile.
Ideally, when you're putting a property under contact it will be something you sought out specifically for a specific buyer from your buyers list because its what they said they want to buy. In essence, you're just an "order taker", and you're going forth into the market place to fill the buyer's order.
Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
9y
@David Dachtera state of Oregon just included the dealing or selling of equitable interests as an activity that is governed by real estate commission IE needs a license.. won't stop anyone.. but if they get turned in.. they will lose..
you need to CLOSE then resell.. simple as that.. the bigger wholesaler players in our market they close. or they are licensed or both
plus you need to be a licensed Developer to work on and flip homes if your doing more than a few a year.. again most don't know it most break the rules until they get cited and fined..
Right - hence, "back-to-back" closings. More fees to the government, more profits to the title companies.
Most of the folks I know only do three or less fix-and-flips a year, fewer if they're serious rehabs due to time frames and resource constraints.
I think a lot of states are finding legislative ways to "get on the REI gravy train", driven by cries of "foul" and "fraud". They jumped ship in deregulation; now, they're scrambling to get back into the mix.
Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
9y
@David Dachtera in Orygun developers license has been around for decades.
selling RE without a license is front and center .. because of complaints of various kinds.
Sub too rental skimming being a big one.
foreclosure bail out frauds
And wholesalers tying up properties not closing and seller relies on the fact that they have a closing coming up they box up all their stuff they put NOn refunable EM on the new place only to have it all unravel as the wholesaler can't close and walks..
I know its buyer beware.. but when your talking the general public this stuff gets to regulators and in this state they protect the citizens.. we only have 4 mil in the whole state so they are pretty keen on jumping on this stuff
Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
9y
@David Dachtera does not matter folks that go down the wholesaling path will 95% of them will just listen to those that talk the best game and tell them that everyone else is nuts its perfectly legal blah blah blah and by the way pay me 30k for my super secret method to success.
@David Dachtera state of Oregon just included the dealing or selling of equitable interests as an activity that is governed by real estate commission IE needs a license.. won't stop anyone.. but if they get turned in.. they will lose..
plus you need to be a licensed Developer to work on and flip homes if your doing more than a few a year.. again most don't know it most break the rules until they get cited and fined..
Jay, can you point me to the law that states that an owner of properties can not develop or renovate and resale those properties without a "developers license" if they do more than 3 a year? I have never heard of that and I have flipped many homes, in all cases being the owner/builder.
Developer · Santa Clarita, CA · Member since 2008 · 15k+ posts · 10k+ votes
9y
Ah, I see. Well that sucks for you Oregoners! I don't see why you should need to be licensed just because you own 4 homes you want to fix up and sell this year so long as you hire licensed contractors and subs to do the work!
Developer · Santa Clarita, CA · Member since 2008 · 15k+ posts · 10k+ votes
9y
In CA, try stuffing a sub for a valid bill and you will get a mechanics l En slappedvon your property preventing you from selling it Neil they are paid. That's all the protection a contractor or sub needs here. On top of that, you could get sued and be liable for court costs and attorneys fees. Dies Oregon allOw for mechanics liens?
Portland, OR · Member since 2016 · 18 posts · 14 votes
9y
@Jay Hinrichs Do you know if the law actually says that you need a license to do flips if you're doing more than 3 per year or is just that you're not likely to get caught if you are doing less than 3?
Investor · Gilbert, AZ · Member since 2015 · 145 posts · 48 votes
9y
Mac, I've attended seminars from numerous well-versed, well-educated sources on the subject of wholesaling and spoken/worked with RE attorneys who write my wholesale contracts.
The easiest way I would describe wholesaling is this: You are not "selling" the property. You are simply assigning the rights (or contract) to purchase said property (* footnote: David D, DVH, et al!).
As I learned during my state licensing exam course, all real-estate contracts are assignable, unless otherwise-specified (either in writing or by local/state law). (I have not seen a NAR Sales Contract without wording to this effect)
Now, as previously pointed out, wholesaling boils down to not just what you say, but also how you say it.
For example, at no time should you ever tell the seller you are closing on the property without the means to actually do so (that is fraud). However, there is nothing wrong with backing out of a deal as long as you have your contingencies in place (loan provision, property/termite inspections, etc.)
Honesty is always the best policy. If you plan on assigning the contract, let them know upfront. A simple, "...after closer inspection, this property isn't necessarily my cup of tea. But I may have a colleague or two who would be interested, is it OK if I show it to them?"
As for "equitable interest", my contract usually spells out that I will be depositing $100 with a title company to open escrow. The contract also outlines who will be paying which expenses.