What makes a fix-and-flip deal worth pursuing in today’s market?

Question

I’m curious how investors and people working with investment deals are approaching opportunities right now.

Are you finding the biggest challenge is sourcing deals with enough margin, managing rehab costs, securing financing, or making the numbers work on the exit?

I’m also interested in what makes you pass on a deal versus move forward, especially when the property looks promising but the numbers are tight.

For those actively buying or working with investors, what’s been working best for you lately?

Alejandro Lopez · Answer

@Darius Gibson Seeing a lot of folks want that DSCR refi as their safety net, but in practice down here, turning a stalled flip into a hold is getting harder to pull off. Between post-renovation tax reassessments and insurance jumps on older Houston roofs, underwriting that rental often comes back at a 1.10 DSCR or worse unless they leave 15–20% of their own cash trapped in the deal. Most of our active flippers are choosing to take a slight haircut on their retail exit—pricing aggressively to move the asset in 30 days—rather than lock up their working liquidity in a break-even rental.
The buyers who are holding are almost entirely doing it intentionally from day one, usually targeting B-class suburban workforce housing where tenant turn is low and the initial debt coverage has a real cushion. Are you seeing many borrowers actually qualify to pull 75–80% of their cash back out on those plan B refis right now, or are DSCR coverage hurdles forcing them to leave significant equity on the table?

Ashish Acharya · Answer

Darius, I think the biggest thing right now is making sure a deal has enough margin to survive something going wrong. A property can look great at the purchase price and still become a thin deal once rehab runs over, financing costs accumulate, or the sale takes longer than expected.

I’d look at the full all-in cost: acquisition, rehab, financing, holding costs, insurance, taxes, selling costs, and a realistic contingency. Then I’d work backward from a conservative resale value rather than letting the projected ARV make the deal work.

I’d also include the tax side of the projected profit. What looks like a $75K spread isn't necessarily $75K in the investor's pocket. And for someone doing flips consistently with meaningful profit, I’d at least evaluate whether an S-Corp makes sense for the active flipping business. It isn't an automatic tax savings strategy, the profit level, volume, reasonable compensation, payroll, and overall situation all matter.

For me, a deal is worth pursuing when it still works after conservative assumptions, not when every variable has to go right. Feel free to DM me, I’d be happy to send over a few resources that might be helpful.

James Jones · Answer

I am a holder, not a flipper, so my test is stricter: a deal is worth pursuing only if it works if the sale never happens. In Memphis I buy single-family under $100K. If the rehab gets it to an ARV of $180K to $265K, and the finished house rents as a 3BR+ Section 8 at $1,395 to $1,950 and clears the 1% rule, then a slow sale is an inconvenience, not a loss — I refinance it with DSCR at 70 to 80% LTV and keep it. The conversion is what creates that margin: 2/1 to 3/1, 3/1 to 4/2, adding 400 to 650 square feet. If a deal only works on a fast retail sale at full price, I pass. Two exits or no deal.

Arman Ahmed · Answer

For me, the deal has to leave enough room for surprises. I look at realistic ARV, rehab costs, holding costs, and selling expenses, then pass if the profit depends on everything going perfectly. Sourcing is probably the hardest part, which is why I’d also look at Midwest markets, where lower purchase prices can leave more room for a solid flip. Reliable local contractors make a big difference, too.

Divin Kanyama · Answer

@Darius Gibson The challenge seems to be less about one single issue and more about several pressures stacking up at once. A deal may have a reasonable purchase price, but financing costs, insurance, taxes, rehab uncertainty, and a conservative exit can quickly remove the margin. That makes disciplined underwriting more important than simply finding more opportunities.

What appears to be working is creating the return at acquisition: targeting stale or poorly presented listings, negotiating seller credits or financing, focusing on manageable value-add, and keeping more than one realistic exit available. A promising property becomes a pass when it only works with perfect occupancy, aggressive rents, a best-case rehab budget, or future appreciation. Tight numbers also leave little room for delays or surprises, so the required margin should reflect the investor’s experience, team, liquidity, and ability to absorb a setback. There may still be good deals, but fewer of them are obvious—and sometimes the best decision is to wait rather than force one.

Alejandro Lopez · Answer

With debt running where it is, there is zero cushion for a 4-week permitting stall or an unexpected cast-iron/foundation surprise. The automatic pass for me on a tight deal comes down to whether the margin is tied to variables I can’t control. If a deal requires a best-case exit valuation or aggressive rent growth just to hit a 1.15 DSCR, it’s dead on arrival.

What’s working right now is ruthless upfront underwriting on fixed operational drains—specifically county tax reassessments and insurance—and strictly buying projects with clean, predictable scopes. We're passing on the "light cosmetic" deals where sellers still want 2022 retail pricing, and leaning into heavier, well-defined cosmetic repositioning where the purchase price is discounted deeply enough to absorb double-digit debt carrying costs without blowing the profit spread.

Alejandro Lopez · Answer

Consider this when you buy a flip with only one way out. If the retail market softens mid-project, can you refinance into a DSCR loan and break even or cash flow as a long-term or medium-term rental? When retail sale at the very top of the comps is the only exit that works, the risk profile is too high.

Darius Gibson · Answer

That’s a good question, Alejandro. It really comes down to the property’s appraised value, rental income, and how the taxes and insurance affect DSCR. Some borrowers can get a good portion of their capital back, while others have to leave more equity in to make the numbers work. I agree that the rental exit needs to be underwritten upfront, not treated as a fallback. Are you working with any Houston investors looking at deals right now? I’d be glad to connect and see if Civic could help with their financing.

Dan H. · Answer

San Diego is similar to what @Alejandro Lopez indicated. Condos, town house, MF are slow to sale and losing value (and I own quite a few MF). This implies SF houses are the safest flip but there is no a viable plan b. In San Diego at high leverage SF houses bleed cash when first placed into service. In addition, the tenant will cause wear and tear on the house which will mean spending extra money to get it back to rehab shape (if it is even possible).

So what can you do? Conservative underwriting is often the only opportunity to reduce risk but it has the side effect of providing less buy opportunities.

My 24 year old son has his first flip in progress (I have never done a flip). He ignored a lot of my advice on this flip. He went way more expensive than I advised on his first flip. He paid significantly more than I would have paid. His underwriting was far less extensive than I do. He spent ~1 hour on the underwriting (and forgot at least one fairly high cost item). I underwrite various scenarios across 2 days (2 days to try to be sure that I do not miss anything significant). I told him I spend quite a few hours underwriting what we offer on.

He is in negotiation for a near wholetail offer. I use near wholetail because he is continuing work during negotiations. If the buyer wants it cheap and livable, she needs to go under contract quickly as demo/work is progressing. If he can make $30k on a near wholetail, I would consider this a big win even though it is much less than he can potentially make on a flip. $30k near wholetail, up to $150k on full flip (I think it is extremely unlikely he makes $150k on the flip and likely will make much less).

Note there is no option other than whole tail or flip for this. His plan b is to make less profit than he hopes.

By the way, my view is every flip should evaluate the wholetail potential.

by the way 2, does it make more sense to flip in a market were improvements provide great increase in value or a cheap market where improvements add hardly any value. I recently added a half bathroom out of existing space in a high PSF property (ARV PSF greater than $2k - mission beach less than 100' from the beach), comps showed the half bathroom added $50k of value How much more does it cost to add a half bathroom in mission beach than Cleveland? How much value does a half bathroom add in Cleveland? The answer makes clear which market provides flippers better opportunities.

Good luck

Caleb Brown · Answer

With rates price can be a hurdle. Sometimes you have to put out many offers before landing one. For a flip I would look at the area and local DOM.

What makes a fix-and-flip deal worth pursuing in today’s market?

What makes a fix-and-flip deal worth pursuing in today’s market?

Most Popular Reply

16 Replies