Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

679
Posts
888
Votes
David Song
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
888
Votes |
679
Posts

Why to avoid < 50 k properties

David Song
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
Posted
If a house sells 50 k and rent for 1000, it meets 2% rule. But actually I think it is not necessarily a good investment. Assuming SFR, 1500 sf, 3 be 2 ba, in small Midwest town. Move on ready. 30 years old. No renovation. Why?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,362
Posts
4,265
Votes
Greg H.
  • Broker/Flipper
  • Austin, TX
4,265
Votes |
4,362
Posts
Greg H.
  • Broker/Flipper
  • Austin, TX
ModeratorReplied

Typical perception from the West Coasters that all Sub 50K properties are dumps in the ghetto.  My worst rental exceeds 2% and some exceed 5%

Purchased 2017 for less than $30K

22K Purchase in 2016

14K Purchase in 2016 on 3 acres rented for $850

I can go on and on.  Blanket statements just do not work in real estate investing

  • Greg H.
  • Loading replies...

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11