Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • FL
27
Votes |
74
Posts

PM asking for money.....

Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • FL
Posted

Hey there everyone! I have a unique situation....or at least one I've never come across. I sold a rental home a few months back and no longer have any ties to it. I received a note from the former property management that I used stating that some of the rent payments bounced because of a credit card that got bounced back from the bank. Now, that PM company wants me to pay them the amount of the bounced funds , $1200. In addition to this, they're stating the charge occurred over six months ago. Has anyone run into something like this before? Any ideas on what to do? Help is appreciated! Thank you. 

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Singapore
3,226
Votes |
1,581
Posts
Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Singapore
Replied

The PM is responsible for rent collection. Once they receive funds, they transfer the funds to the owner. No PM transfers uncleared checks for example. If the PM used CC to collect rent then they assumed the risk of dealing with the CC company. Maybe no one expected a reversal after six months and this should be easily resolved by the PM with the CC company. The ex owner did not get the funds from Visa and doesn't need to deal with them. The PM did and can recover the funds from the CC by showing documentation that the payment was legitimate. That is the correct resolution for this matter. The PM just is lazy and doesn't want to fight with Visa and is going for the easy route of claiming from ex owner.

Loading replies...

1 2