Updated 4 months ago on . Most recent reply
Eviction grounds. Disorderly conduct?
My tenant is upset that I fined them for repeatedly parking unauthorized in the driveway. So I have him on camera tampering with the hallway camera. Specifically, he grabbed and turned it to where it slightly refocused. Not.ne essarily damaged (I havent been there to see yet) Is this grounds for filing for eviction? Is it grounds that does NOT require a notice to cease? Does it fall under disorderly conduct? And if so, I'm seeing conflicting info on if disorderly conduct eviction requres a Notice to Cease.
Most Popular Reply
@Rashad Ellis, a couple thoughts:
1. What did you charge for parking unauthorized in the driveway? It seems unusual that a lease would specify a fee for such a violation in the same way we have a late fee for paying rent late.
2. With the parking violations, I would only charge them if I could CLEARLY SHOW that I had a cost associated with their violation. For example, I could not park in the driveway, so I had to park in a paid parking lot 1 block away for $50. I would charge them the $50 as "damage" caused by their violation.
3. Generally, I would handle a lease violation like the parking with a lease violation warning. I would initiate it with a direct conversation over the phone followed up by a written lease violation letter.
If the tenant repeated the same violation, I would simply have the vehicle towed and they would have to pay the tow company for the tow and storage or end up losing their vehicle.
4. For the tampering of the hallway camera, I would pay my handyman to go to the property to readjust the camera and bill the tenant back for that cost. Very simple.
If they want to do that every week and get charged $100 for the service call every week they can do that.
5. I would not try to evict based on these sorts of issues, but if it was a continuing issue, I would nonrenew them.
The reason I would not likely try to evict is that it isn't easy and cookie cutter. They could make any sort of claim about these things. For example, that they had something heavy to move and needed to park in the driveway temporarily to load/unload and that the landlord had allowed that when moving in so they thought it was "ok.
When it comes to evictions, for the tenant its their HOME. So, there may be a tendency to give them the benefit of the doubt because the impact of an eviction on them is more substantial than it is for the landlord.
So, when at all possible, I want an eviction to be cookie-cutter, almost always for nonpayment so that I will succeed virtually 100% of the time on my own without having to pay a lawyer.



