My first reposition: 11 Units, One Brutal Eviction - Lessons Learned

My first reposition: 11 Units, One Brutal Eviction - Lessons Learned

Rental Property Investor · Seattle, WA · Member since 2017 · 384 posts · 249 votes

The Cambridge | Aberdeen, WA |
https://www.redfin.com/WA/Aberdeen/201-N-F-St-98520/home/14785920

We bought an 11-unit building in Aberdeen, WA, for $670,200 in May 2024. The listing was messy, the property needed some love, and the numbers suggested an opportunity. We figured a little elbow grease, thoughtful improvements, better tenant screening, and incremental rent increases could turn it into a solid income property.

We were right about the opportunity. The financing environment had other plans.

We financed the acquisition with a commercial credit union loan at 7.85% and privately financed the down payment at 8%, expecting to refinance when rates came down. They didn't. (If anyone knows where the rate-drop memo went, please forward it.)

So we kept working the plan. We're now about eight months behind my original timeline (so it goes), but after renovating and updating all 11 units, the building is fully repositioned and we're ready to pass it along to the next investor. I know it's right for someone out there. It's just done being right for us.

The Deal Points:

  • Purchase price: $670,200 (May 2024)

  • Current asking price: $949,900 (October 2026) - just reduced

  • Cap rate: 9.09%

  • Building: 11 units, 7,442 sq. ft., built in 1925

  • Location: Downtown Aberdeen, Washington, on a .26-acre corner lot with off street, fenced parking lot.

    Commentary: Of course there's still upside here. The next owner has room to continue growing rents with an established tenant base, introduce paid parking for an additional revenue stream, and tackle the remaining roof project. We've done the heavy lifting on the reposition, but there's still value left to unlock.

3 Lessons Learned:

1. An eviction isn't over until it's OVER.

I refused to inherit a $10K eviction and negotiated hard to get the seller through the writ process. We closed with the eviction finished but the tenant refused to vacate. Working with the sheriff and her Section 8 team, we eventually got the unit back. What followed was a roughly $15K renovation, an undiscovered bedroom (!!) the loss of 2 cleaning vendors and contractor because the unit was so bad, and the cost of moving and storing the tenant's belongings in accordance with state law.

Brutal doesn't begin to cover it. In hindsight, we should have waited until the unit was fully vacant before closing.

2. Reserves. Always more reserves.

Unexpected leaks, water heaters, deferred maintenance, and pest remediation add up. And apparently, yes, Western Washington has roaches. I've lived here for 20 years and somehow missed that memo.

3. Small improvements compound.

We replaced flooring, painted units, upgraded appliances and toilets to low flow to decrease water bills. We repaired parking lot potholes, added exterior lighting and security cameras, installed a coded security gate, and established monthly cleaning for common areas. We screened tenants carefully, improved the tenant base, and raised rents incrementally while retaining good residents.

No single project transformed this building. All of them together did.

Current Evaluation And Thoughts:

The original plan was to refinance the privately financed down payment when rates dropped. That hasn't happened, and we're making a decision based on the market we're actually in, not the one we hoped we'd be in by now.

We bought a property with potential and put in the work to realize it. Our asking price is nearly $280K above our acquisition price. That's not net profit, of course, but it reflects a meaningful repositioning in a relatively short period.


The Cambridge is now a repositioned 11-unit property with a 9.09% cap rate, established tenants, improved units, and opportunities for additional revenue.

What I'm Proud Of:

This was a full reposition, not a passive appreciation play.

I had no money of my own in the deal and still own 50%.

I found and managed a great PM team
Most importantly, we improved the quality of the building, the block, and the living experience for our tenants. Our mission is to provide quality, market-rate housing while maintaining and compounding positive cash flow to fund future investments. We accomplished that here.

I'm proud we took a building that needed attention and made it a better place to live. That's the part that doesn't always show up on a spreadsheet.

What's Next?

I'm not finished with multifamily, in fact I love it! I love the economy of scale, the problem-solving, and finding something with potential and making it better. I'd happily take on another deal this size, and I'd also consider a minority position in a syndication where I could contribute and learn from the sidelines. I'm especially interested in the South Sound: Olympia, Tacoma, Federal Way, Shelton, and surrounding markets.

And for the BiggerPockets crowd, I'd genuinely love your take:

  • Would you sell a repositioned property in this rate environment, or hold and wait for better financing?

  • Would you have closed with an eviction still in process, or made vacant possession a hard condition of closing?

  • For those investing in the South Sound, where are you finding opportunities right now?


We've all got a deal that taught us something the hard way. This one definitely delivered.

1Reply
193 views

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Ashish AcharyaBusiness Member
    CPA, CFP®, PFS · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2017 · 5k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    22h

    Christen, this sounds like one of those deals where the spreadsheet tells only part of the story. You clearly put a lot of work into turning the property around.

    From the tax side, I'd be careful about comparing the $670K purchase price to the $950K asking price and treating the difference as the gain. After renovations, selling costs, depreciation, and your ownership structure, the actual after-tax result can look very different.

    Since you're still planning to stay in multifamily, I'd also look at the sell vs. hold vs. 1031 scenarios before deciding. If the property is held through a partnership, I'd want to understand how the gain, depreciation, and distributions flow to each owner as well.

    You've already created value in the property. The next question is how much of that value you actually keep after tax and what the capital can do for you in the next deal.

    Great lessons learned here, especially the reminder about reserves.

    INVESTOR FRIENDLY CPA®4.9242 Reviews
    TaxMD® | Tax Planning Software
  • Mark UpdegraffBusiness Member
    Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2010 · 1k+ posts · 711 votes
    15h

    @Christen G. , I’d make the sell-versus-hold decision from two forward-looking numbers: the stabilized cash yield on the equity you have tied up today, and the after-cost cash you would actually have available to redeploy after a sale. The $670K purchase price is history. I’d want trailing collections and operating expenses after the reposition, the remaining roof obligation, current debt terms and a realistic buyer’s cap rate. If the renovated operation earns an acceptable return on today’s equity, holding can make sense; if the value is mostly trapped behind expensive debt and the next deal offers a better risk-adjusted use of the proceeds, selling may be the cleaner answer. What does the last six months look like after the units stabilized?

  • Chicago, IL · Member since 2026 · 19 posts · 5 votes
    12h

    Christen, the eviction lesson is the part I would turn into a hard acquisition checklist item. An eviction reaching the end of the legal process and a unit being delivered vacant are not the same operational condition.

    On a future deal, I would want vacant possession defined in practical terms: the occupant is out, access and keys are under control, belongings have been handled as required, and the unit can be walked immediately before closing. That final walkthrough also matters when the unit may contain condition or layout surprises that were not visible during the original review.

    The contract language, possession process, and handling of remaining property are state-specific, so local counsel should set the actual terms. Operationally, though, the handoff should be verified before the buyer owns the problem.

  • Matthew MorrowBusiness Member
    Investor · PA - NY - NJ · Member since 2019 · 904 posts · 318 votes
    3h

    @Christen G. thanks for writing this up so honestly. Counting on rates coming down for the refi is something a lot of us did. The way I've tried to underwrite since is making sure a deal can live with the financing it has on day one, and treating a better refi as a bonus. Easier said than done, especially when the opportunity is clearly there like it was with your building. Hope the next phase is a lot calmer.

    CORE Team | Realty ONE Group Supreme548 Reviews
  • Divin KanyamaBusiness Member
    Accountant · Seattle, WA · Member since 2025 · 612 posts · 254 votes
    2h

    @Christen G. I appreciate how candid you are about both the progress and the parts that didn’t go to plan. Being in the Seattle area, the South Sound mention caught my eye, but what really stood out was the work you put into making the Cambridge a better place to live.

    Those everyday improvements matter to residents, even when they don’t make the headline numbers.

    Your financing lesson really lands, too. A property can have genuine potential and still be a tough fit for the way the deal is funded. I wouldn’t automatically see selling as giving up; if holding means relying on a refinance that may not arrive on your timeline, deciding based on today’s cash flow, reserves, and remaining roof work seems grounded. The higher asking price is only part of that picture, as you pointed out—not the same as money in your pocket.

    The vacant-possession lesson is another important takeaway. Having the legal process move forward and actually having the unit back are clearly two different milestones. I respect that you’ve shared those details alongside the wins. There’s a lot of value in an honest account of what a repositioning takes—and in recognizing when a property can be right for the next owner without needing to remain right for you.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.