Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Goals, Business Plans & Entities
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

21
Posts
10
Votes
John Sween
  • Investor
10
Votes |
21
Posts

What do you guys think about this?

John Sween
  • Investor
Posted

Option 1 – Regular Saving/ No new action

Save approximately $7,000 per month. To reach the same $90,000 would take almost 13 months of savings.

Option 2 – Cash out / Buy quickly if something is found

Cash flow increase by about $1800-2300 per month depending on rents and accounting for property manager.

So New savings goes to $8800-$9300 x 13 months = $114,400 - $120,900

Option 3 – Cash out/ Cant find any property within 13 months

Cash flow decreases by $1,500. Total cash to purchase increases $90,000.

$5,500 x 13 months = $71,500 + $90,000 from cash out = $161,500.

With option 1, you don’t have the ability to purchase if something shows up on market.

With option 2, you increase your cash flow and gain an equity-growing asset.

With option 3, you are still ahead of the savings in option 1 and you have the opportunity if there is something that comes to market.

Cons -risk, I lose my interest rate of 2.3% on house 1. And I lose 3.5% on house 2. Both would reach to 4.45-5%.

Or should I wait?

Loading replies...