Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply
Should age determine someone’s knowledge in real estate ?
The question that I’ve been needing answers on! Should age determine someone’s knowledge in this type of work!? I will state my opinion and after that I would like any opinions anyone has! My opinion is NO, age should NOT determine someone’s knowledge, I’m really young in this game and I feel my knowledge is skyrocketing each day more and more! Then again it goes with the time I invest in this as well, countless nights studying local markets , figuring out numbers , calling countless of people back to back, and the list goes on. I want people to hear my opinion out , maybe if you’re hesitant with someone’s age on a deal just hear them out see how they present themselves. Lots of agents and home owners think I’m a lot older by just the way I present myself! I would now like to hear everyone’s opinions! Thanks for your time.
Most Popular Reply

Experience has little to do with age, and also doesn't always have a lot to do with the number of years an agent has been licensed either. Age brings life experience, which is often useful in real estate since customers are usually in some sort of transition in life, good or bad. And, at the same time, an older agent can still be brand new, or only work part time.
There is a difference between "having a real estate license" and "having a real estate business". About 20% of the agents in Albuquerque, where I am, have sold just 1 property, or none, during the last 12 months. 5 or 10 years of no sales from an "agent" who "has a real estate license" still equals 0 sales. Meanwhile, maybe you've only had your real estate business for 3 or 4 years, selling 25 houses each year. If you've got 100 deals under your belt, and another agent got their licensed 10 years ago, but still at 0 sales, which would you hire?