Updated 19 days ago on . Most recent reply
How We Revived a "Dead" 500 Lead List Using Multi Source Data Stacking
Hey BiggerPockets community,
I know am still new here but am really looking forward to connect with you all !!
I wanted to share a quick breakdown of how we recently pulled 3 solid, motivated seller appointments out of a list that a local investor had essentially thrown in the trash.
Coming from a Computer Science background, I’ve always been obsessed with data integrity. Most people just pull a single list from one provider and start dialing that’s where they lose. We’ve found that the secret isn’t just "making more calls," it’s starting with a cleaner, higher-intent
data set.
What we did differently:
1. Data Stacking (The "Triple Threat"): Instead of just one motivator, we focused on "stacked" leads—properties that hit three or more triggers (e.g., Absentee + High Equity + Vacant).
2. Multi-Source Validation: We cross reference our lists against three different enterprise grade databases to ensure the "owner of record" is actually the person we’re calling.
3. The "Pattern Interrupt" Script: We ditched the "I want to buy y
our house" line. With better data, we knew the specific situation (like a recent probate or tax lien), so we used a "consultative approach" that felt more like a helpful neighbor than a solicitor.
The Result: We didn't just get leads; we got answers. We saw a 40% increase in contact rates compared to the "standard" lists most agencies use.
Data is the fuel for any cold calling engine. If your data is dirty, your dialers are just burning money.
I’m curious for those of you doing outbound right now, are you seeing better results with niche lists (Probate/Code Violation) or broad lists (High Equity/Absentee)? I’m happy to share the specific stacking criteria we use to filter out the noise.
Let's connect!
Saeed Daoud
Founder | The Lead Vendor



