Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Account Closed
  • Attorney
  • Sacramento, CA
172
Votes |
300
Posts

Insurance rates in California

Account Closed
  • Attorney
  • Sacramento, CA
Posted

Hi BP!

I'm comparing insurance quotes right now for an owner-occupied duplex in Sacramento. All the quotes default with no flood or earthquake insurance. 

For my CA people, do you carry earthquake coverage? Why or why not?

Also, I'm being quoted right around $1,100 yr for a place built in 1991 with liability of $300,000, and a $1,000 deductible (personal property $200k). I do not want to increase my liability coverage at this point. Do you think I can beat that $1,100/yr number?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

289
Posts
151
Votes
Derek Daun
  • Investor
  • Sacramento, CA
151
Votes |
289
Posts
Derek Daun
  • Investor
  • Sacramento, CA
Replied

I live in Sacramento with both personal and investment properties. I don't have earthquake insurance on any of them, and neither does anyone I know. IMO the potential payout is too low verses the cost and actual risk. 

Flood insurance depends on the location. Do a Google search for Sacramento Flood Map. There are some locations considered risky, but not as risky to require the insurance. During the housing boom there were a bunch of properties built in high risk areas, but for dubious reasons, were categorized as lower risk not requiring insurance. I believe the Feds have addressed that now though.

$1100 a year for a duplex seems about right.

Loading replies...