Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
1
Votes
Jimmy Kiefer
  • Investor
  • Mankato, MN
1
Votes |
21
Posts

1888-1910 too old for a property?

Jimmy Kiefer
  • Investor
  • Mankato, MN
Posted

Several properties I am looking to buy were built around 1900. Should I avoid properties this old? Especially since I will be a buy and hold owner, does the age of these properties create an unnecessary risk? Appreciate any feedback at all!!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,658
Posts
1,414
Votes
Tom S.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Burlington, VT
1,414
Votes |
2,658
Posts
Tom S.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Burlington, VT
Replied

Not at all - in the Northeast at least, many properties are older than that and are beautiful buildings.  Certainly get it inspected and make sure everything is up to code (electrical, plumbing), and if not, budget for rehab accordingly.  But many of these homes have "good bones".  My oldest is 1853 and you can still see the original ax marks on the wood beams!

- Tom

Loading replies...