Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

44
Posts
6
Votes
Matthew Harrison
  • Property Manager
  • Redford, MI
6
Votes |
44
Posts

buyers agent but no listing agent

Matthew Harrison
  • Property Manager
  • Redford, MI
Posted

I have read and understand the theory of using a buyers agent because the seller pays the cost. So why would you not? However, does this theory remain when the seller does not have a listing agent? I have  a coworker that wants out of his house.  My only "need" for a buyers agent would be to walk me through the steps of closing that I am just starting to get familiar with, and make sure the sale is done properly.  But then how will she get paid? Am I taking money out of my sellers hands? Out of my own hands? 

Loading replies...