Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
2
Votes
Michael Ray
  • Homeowner
  • Atlanta, GA
2
Votes |
3
Posts

Is it possible to salvage this deal?

Michael Ray
  • Homeowner
  • Atlanta, GA
Posted

Hi all. Two years ago, I bought a property in the SF Bay Area with the intention of it being a primary residence. With the pandemic, I had some life events that necessitated moving out of state indefinitely, and rather than sell, I decided to rent it out to at least keep the mortgage paid. After management, CapEx, and repairs, I have been going in the hole about $125 a month on the property.

Even though property values have gone up quite a bit, rents in the area are down. I think I am probably charging more than what the place is worth currently, and it still isn't enough. I can probably afford to keep going in the hole if I have to, but if the tenants move out unexpectedly or I need a big repair in the next year or two, I will be in big trouble. Because I only lived in the home for a year, if I decide to sell, I'll have to go through a 1031 exchange.

A few real estate investors and agents I have spoken to have recommended keeping the property because of the long-term potential of Bay Area housing. On the other hand, I have been considering selling it now to get the equity out and investing in a property that I can actually make money on. A cash-out refinance may also be an option, but I am worried about raising the mortgage payment.

I thought I would post here to get some input from the community. Is there a way that makes keeping this house make sense? Or should I cut and run while I still can? Thanks for any advice or insights!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

44,247
Posts
65,303
Votes
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Real Estate Consultant
  • Summerlin, NV
65,303
Votes |
44,247
Posts
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Real Estate Consultant
  • Summerlin, NV
Replied
Originally posted by @Darius Ogloza:

Of course, there are no guarantees in the investment world but a 2% increase in the value of a typical say $800,000 Bay Area home (increases have of course exceeded that rate historically) is $16,000, which means that in a given year you would be ahead $16,000 - $1,500 (i.e. $125/month) + 12 months of principal paydown. The key of course (as you observe in the OP) is to have sufficient reserves to weather the storms. If my goal were to build wealth, I would be focusing on how to build up my reserves to cover emergencies - friends, family, personal loan, HELOC, etc. If the goal is to generate monthly cash, sale makes sense.

I just chuckle at these Bay Area threads and the folks that dont live in the Bay area that just automatically say if its negative cash flow dump it..  I know I have posted this many times.. but I fell into the same thought process when I sold my home in Palo Alto  I could have kept it but it was going to cost me about 300 a month negative  How could it possibly be worth keeping.. well sold it for 500k  and well it sold in 2018 for 3 million .. over the course of maybe 5 to 7 years it would have been 300 positive then 1000 positive then 2k positive and paid for by now. 

Bay area hard to get into you sell U cant come back..  I cant come back I cant pay 3 mil for a 1500 sq ft home in Palo Alto.. but sure is one of my biggest shoulda Woulda Coulda stories..  

Not saying the OP is going to have the same experience but listening to people in other parts of the country that have no clue as to the dynamics of Bay Area real estate and would just jettison a home over 1500 a year not sure i would be listening to them.     In their markets that could be the wise choice  But SF  LA Seattle  etc these are different animals.

business profile image
JLH Capital Partners

Loading replies...