Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
7
Votes
David Algava
  • Saint Petersburg, FL
7
Votes |
22
Posts

What is an unimproved lane in survey? Pic included

David Algava
  • Saint Petersburg, FL
Posted

So the seller provided this survey in advance of closing.  As you can see in the image, there is a note stating "15 ft wide unimproved lane as referenced in deed, dated Dec 1818."

My agent and title aren't sure what this is. They say, probably just the HOA owns some land back there in the yard.

The whole complex was built in 1988. An unimproved lane almost sounds like a road or walkway could be allowed in the backyard. Anyone ever seen this before?  I'm sure it's not a deal killer, but still seems worth verifying.

Loading replies...