Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

175
Posts
51
Votes
Adam M.
  • Lawrence, KS
51
Votes |
175
Posts

Expected IRR on smaller MF value add

Adam M.
  • Lawrence, KS
Posted

Curious as to what IRR you look for in a value add MF. I spent an hour or so building a model with some guestimates. Kinda curious how far off I would be. With no rehab I estimated the IRR to be 12% and w/ rehab 22%.

Here is the model

https://www.dropbox.com/s/t3x56gkrs2glzgl/905-907-...

Property in question

http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/20414371/905-907-W-...

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,219
Posts
11,329
Votes
Joel Owens
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
11,329
Votes |
15,219
Posts
Joel Owens
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
ModeratorReplied

29% expenses in your model for 2 buildings built in the 1920's is not realistic. If landlord pays water would use about 55 to 60% expenses annually and if not about 50%.

Property taxes may go up based on the purchase price after closing and also the property insurance likely is higher. Sometimes the sellers show really low insurance in numbers but they have a lot of properties insured versus a single property owner policy.

These are all 1 beds which i generally do not like unless next to a college for student housing or a bunch of older people live there. It appears multiple levels so would need an elevator versus the stairs. If no elevator then the unit rent range likely varies by floor. Need to look at crime surrounding the buildings and who the other owners are. If you have the nicest buildings on the block and high crime then marginal tenants might be all you can attract to live there. Check for the tenant loyalty factor which is what percentage of the building has been there over 2 to 3 years and what is their pay history? If owner recently slammed tenants in and is making wild number assumptions to sell then might be best to walk away. If they are claiming low 20's for expenses then typically they cut corners somewhere instead of properly maintaining the asset and major deferred maintenance exists. Make sure all the units are properly permitted. Appears to have windows air units and a flat roof which can have other issues.

business profile image
NNN Invest
5.0 stars
3 Reviews

Loading replies...