Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

53
Posts
52
Votes
Bradley Jernigan
  • Investor
52
Votes |
53
Posts

Stabilized Or Value Add Property

Bradley Jernigan
  • Investor
Posted

What do you guys think are usually the better deals? A deal that is stabilized with passive income coming from tenant’s rents or a burnt down/value add property where you would not make as much passive income but will make a considerable amount on the sale/refi? Personally I like having a stabilized property more but I feel as though value add deals are a great way to get started. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,080
Posts
13,351
Votes
Mike Dymski
#2 Market Trends & Data Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
13,351
Votes |
5,080
Posts
Mike Dymski
#2 Market Trends & Data Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
Replied

Value add.  Can make ten years of "cash flow" in one year of value add.

Loading replies...