My lender has issue with specific exclusion language on my policy, that the policy was over 100 pages long. The insurance broker said the exclusion was just for cosmetic things for roof. But lender's internal underwriting rejected that insurance. I went to my primary house insurance company, but they don't deal with 4-plex.
I'm wondering if anyone has run into that issue before? What insurance company do you use for small multifamily? I personally won't file insurance claim for anything under $10,000. So I'm looking for a policy that has a competitive price.
My lender has issue with specific exclusion language on my policy, that the policy was over 100 pages long. The insurance broker said the exclusion was just for cosmetic things for roof. But lender's internal underwriting rejected that insurance. I went to my primary house insurance company, but they don't deal with 4-plex.
I'm wondering if anyone has run into that issue before? What insurance company do you use for small multifamily? I personally won't file insurance claim for anything under $10,000. So I'm looking for a policy that has a competitive price.
Thanks in advance for any insights!
Well, I'm told the wind blew through about 15 years ago and did about $1billion in damage in Phoenix. Maybe that's the problem.
@Theresa Harris I have a lender I work closely with and they are not a bank. My previous duplex deal with them was fine and insured by Statefarm. Statefarm don't do 4 units.
@Theresa Harris I have a lender I work closely with and they are not a bank. My previous duplex deal with them was fine and insured by Statefarm. Statefarm don't do 4 units.
Below are two options built for landlords. Otherwise, google an insurance agent in your area for landlord insurance.
Professional · Clinton Township, MI · Member since 2015 · 680 posts · 259 votes
7mo
Happy to help. That said, cosmetic exclusions/limits for roof or siding are not uncommon. Basically insurance companies don't want to replace an entire roof because some shingles don't perfectly match color due to color changes over time or exact availability.
@Owen Rosen Yeah. My lender told me penny Mac loan cannot accept that specific wording. The one I purchased has rolled roof and not even shingles. I'm wondering if insurance company can remove that term if I set my deductible high? And I don't plan to use insurance for anything under 10k.
@Owen Rosen Yeah. My lender told me penny Mac loan cannot accept that specific wording. The one I purchased has rolled roof and not even shingles. I'm wondering if insurance company can remove that term if I set my deductible high? And I don't plan to use insurance for anything under 10k.
They won't be able to alter their forms in this way. You should speak with a broker that can work on your behalf.
Real Estate Agent · Memphis · Member since 2026 · 570 posts · 336 votes
7mo
This happens more often with small multifamily than people expect — lenders aren’t just looking at price, they’re looking at how the exclusions affect collateral protection.
Even if the broker says it’s “cosmetic roof only,” underwriting is asking a different question: If there’s storm damage, is there any scenario where the lender’s security (the structure) isn’t fully covered? If the wording creates ambiguity, they’ll often reject it.
A few things that usually help:
Ask the lender for the exact required endorsement or wording they need. Sometimes it’s very specific.
Have your broker shop carriers that regularly insure 2–4 unit properties, not just single-family converted policies.
Make sure the policy form matches the property type (DP vs. commercial package can matter).
Confirm replacement cost language and roof settlement terms.
For 4-plexes, many owners end up with carriers that specialize in landlord or small multifamily policies rather than standard homeowners insurers.
The deductible strategy (like not filing under $10K) is fine from your side, but the lender’s concern is worst-case structural loss — not minor claims.
This is usually a wording and carrier fit issue, not a red flag on the property itself.