I'm investigating replacement properties in anticipation of doing a 1031 out of our current property. In looking at some Midwest metros, I see quite a few older (1910s-1940s) multi-story brick construction apartment buildings available. Are these buildings potential cap ex nightmares moving forward? Many that I see have beautifully renovated interiors and claim to be in desirable neighborhoods, but I'd be concerned about the building's age and potential major repairs. What are typical major capital expense items for these buildings? Would these properties be too risky for someone like myself who needs reliable cash flow heading into retirement within 5 years?
I'm investigating replacement properties in anticipation of doing a 1031 out of our current property. In looking at some Midwest metros, I see quite a few older (1910s-1940s) multi-story brick construction apartment buildings available. Are these buildings potential cap ex nightmares moving forward? Many that I see have beautifully renovated interiors and claim to be in desirable neighborhoods, but I'd be concerned about the building's age and potential major repairs. What are typical major capital expense items for these buildings? Would these properties be too risky for someone like myself who needs reliable cash flow heading into retirement within 5 years?
Those older apartment buildings are quite common in the Midwest and can definitely be solid opportunities and great buys in markets like Columbus. I personally own several myself. Many of these properties have been successfully renovated and repositioned. They have their own quirks and risks, so doing your due diligence is a must.
I'm investigating replacement properties in anticipation of doing a 1031 out of our current property. In looking at some Midwest metros, I see quite a few older (1910s-1940s) multi-story brick construction apartment buildings available. Are these buildings potential cap ex nightmares moving forward? Many that I see have beautifully renovated interiors and claim to be in desirable neighborhoods, but I'd be concerned about the building's age and potential major repairs. What are typical major capital expense items for these buildings? Would these properties be too risky for someone like myself who needs reliable cash flow heading into retirement within 5 years?
That's a valid concern. But many of them went through major upgrades already and can be a very good investment option. I own 50+ units in Columbus, happy to share my experience
Had a large portfolio in Indy. Basements, sewer lines, knob & tube wiring. Have to model it in the capex calc.
I'm investigating replacement properties in anticipation of doing a 1031 out of our current property. In looking at some Midwest metros, I see quite a few older (1910s-1940s) multi-story brick construction apartment buildings available. Are these buildings potential cap ex nightmares moving forward? Many that I see have beautifully renovated interiors and claim to be in desirable neighborhoods, but I'd be concerned about the building's age and potential major repairs. What are typical major capital expense items for these buildings? Would these properties be too risky for someone like myself who needs reliable cash flow heading into retirement within 5 years?
I'm investigating replacement properties in anticipation of doing a 1031 out of our current property. In looking at some Midwest metros, I see quite a few older (1910s-1940s) multi-story brick construction apartment buildings available. Are these buildings potential cap ex nightmares moving forward? Many that I see have beautifully renovated interiors and claim to be in desirable neighborhoods, but I'd be concerned about the building's age and potential major repairs. What are typical major capital expense items for these buildings? Would these properties be too risky for someone like myself who needs reliable cash flow heading into retirement within 5 years?
Mark, that’s a great question and honestly something a lot of investors overlook when they see nicely renovated interiors on older buildings. Those 1910s–1940s brick apartments can actually be very solid structurally, but the big thing to watch is the major systems rather than the brick itself. The common capex items on those buildings tend to be roofs, plumbing (a lot still have original cast iron or galvanized lines), electrical panels or outdated wiring, boilers or older HVAC systems, sewer lines, and sometimes foundation or tuckpointing work on the brick over time. Windows, insulation, and drainage can also come up depending on how well the property was maintained historically. The key is really getting thorough inspections and understanding when those big-ticket items were last replaced because a building that already had plumbing, electrical, roof, and mechanical systems updated can actually perform very well for decades. If reliable cash flow heading into retirement is the goal, many investors try to balance older character buildings with strong market fundamentals so rent demand stays consistent. That’s one reason a lot of people are starting to look at Columbus, Ohio. The macroeconomics here are really strong right now with population growth, strong job growth, and major companies expanding here like Intel, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Honda, LG and others, plus a huge tenant base from Ohio State University. Because of that demand, you can still find properties around the $120k–180k range that hit the 1% rule and produce positive cash flow while still having strong appreciation potential as the city continues to grow. A lot of investors like the balance here between affordable entry price, landlord friendly laws, and long term economic growth. Happy to connect and answer any questions you have!
Our number one maintenance issue is plumbing issues. Most it one galvanized water lines and cast iron drain lines. It’s not even close. In Indianapolis anyway.
When I buy a place with these things I fully replumb in pex and I keep the vertical cast iron stacks buried in the wall and underground, but replace the horizontal drain lines and what I can see in the basement with pvc. That’s at least 50% of your maintenance calls. Knob and tube wiring can be an issue depending on the electrical loads, but unfortunately it’s super common and super expensive to 100% replace so it’s left alone most of the time.
I'm investigating replacement properties in anticipation of doing a 1031 out of our current property. In looking at some Midwest metros, I see quite a few older (1910s-1940s) multi-story brick construction apartment buildings available. Are these buildings potential cap ex nightmares moving forward? Many that I see have beautifully renovated interiors and claim to be in desirable neighborhoods, but I'd be concerned about the building's age and potential major repairs. What are typical major capital expense items for these buildings? Would these properties be too risky for someone like myself who needs reliable cash flow heading into retirement within 5 years?
Honestly, just keep decent maintenance on it, and you'll be good. Those houses are built DIFFERENT. I've sold brick buildings like that, built in 1850, and they are doing great. I would desire that type building almost any other type building
In my market Chicago all the multi unit buildings are 100 years old. The brick buildings tend to actually be built much better then todays construction and are very desirable often selling for a premium. I very rarely see clients replace all the things mentioned by some other posters. You do an inspection just like you would for any age property and fix things that are needed.
I'm investigating replacement properties in anticipation of doing a 1031 out of our current property. In looking at some Midwest metros, I see quite a few older (1910s-1940s) multi-story brick construction apartment buildings available. Are these buildings potential cap ex nightmares moving forward? Many that I see have beautifully renovated interiors and claim to be in desirable neighborhoods, but I'd be concerned about the building's age and potential major repairs. What are typical major capital expense items for these buildings? Would these properties be too risky for someone like myself who needs reliable cash flow heading into retirement within 5 years?
There are 200+ year old homes in New England area of US that seem to sell well.
What do you think their conditions are?
A lot of the comments here are correctly pointing out specific systems (plumbing, electrical, boilers, etc.), but the bigger question with those Midwest brick buildings isn’t really the age — it’s whether the major system cycles have already been reset.
Many of those 1910–1940 properties actually have extremely durable structures. The brick and framing often outlast modern construction. The risk usually comes from buildings that have had cosmetic renovations but not mechanical resets.
The things I’d want to understand before underwriting one are:
• When the vertical plumbing stacks were last replaced (cast iron eventually becomes a maintenance machine).
• Whether the electrical service and panels were upgraded enough to support modern loads.
• The condition of sewer lines and lateral connections — many of these buildings still have original infrastructure to the street.
• Roof/parapet and tuckpointing cycles, since deferred masonry maintenance can accelerate quickly.
• Heating systems (a lot still rely on older boilers that can be efficient but expensive to replace).
If the building has already gone through a full mechanical modernization in the last 15–20 years, these properties can actually be extremely stable long-term holds.
If it’s mostly renovated interiors sitting on top of original infrastructure, then you’re effectively inheriting the cap-ex cycle.
Since you mentioned retirement in ~5 years, the real underwriting question might be:
Would you rather own a building where the major systems were already replaced, or one where you may be the one funding those replacements during your hold period?
That tends to matter more than the construction era itself.