Homeowner · New Port Richey, FL · Member since 2025 · 23 posts · 18 votes
I have been looking to invest in Cleveland and getting feedback that the tenants don't usually pay for all utilities. It's difficult to cash flow when an investor has to pay for water/sewer expenses. Any feedback regarding that cash flow dilemma?
I have been looking to invest in Cleveland and getting feedback that the tenants don't usually pay for all utilities. It's difficult to cash flow when an investor has to pay for water/sewer expenses. Any feedback regarding that cash flow dilemma?
Water and sewer are definitely something you have to underwrite carefully in Cleveland, but they don't automatically kill cash flow. Many successful investors build those costs into their underwriting and purchase price. The key is buying at the right basis, verifying historical utility bills, and looking for opportunities to separately meter utilities when it makes sense. A good deal will still cash flow, even with owner-paid water, if you've accounted for it up front.
I have been looking to invest in Cleveland and getting feedback that the tenants don't usually pay for all utilities. It's difficult to cash flow when an investor has to pay for water/sewer expenses. Any feedback regarding that cash flow dilemma?
Investors are targeting Cleveland specifically for the cash flow. Many multifamily properties aren't separately metered for water, so it's common for owners to include water and sewer in the rent. It's rarely a deal breaker as long as you underwrite those expenses correctly.
@Evan Hopple I have noticed with a few properties by running the numbers that the water/ sewer expenses has taken a chunk out of the cash flow. I will continue my search in a propery that provides a better cash flow cushion .
I have been looking to invest in Cleveland and getting feedback that the tenants don't usually pay for all utilities. It's difficult to cash flow when an investor has to pay for water/sewer expenses. Any feedback regarding that cash flow dilemma?
@Dennis Minary Dennis, that's a common consideration in Cleveland and other Midwest markets. Rather than looking at utilities in isolation, I'd underwrite the deal using the actual historical water, sewer, and maintenance costs to see whether the property still meets your cash flow goals. If the numbers work after those expenses, it can still be a solid market despite tenants not paying every utility.
I do agree and have been conservative running my numbers . One of the concerns is an excessive usage of water . However , I will find a property that fits my cash flow numbers.
@Dennis Minary - On a quadraplex I have the water bill is consistently +/-$25 each month based the historical average of about $50-60 per unit. Are finding the water expenses much higher per unit?
I have been looking to invest in Cleveland and getting feedback that the tenants don't usually pay for all utilities. It's difficult to cash flow when an investor has to pay for water/sewer expenses. Any feedback regarding that cash flow dilemma?
Water and sewer are definitely something you have to underwrite carefully in Cleveland, but they don't automatically kill cash flow. Many successful investors build those costs into their underwriting and purchase price. The key is buying at the right basis, verifying historical utility bills, and looking for opportunities to separately meter utilities when it makes sense. A good deal will still cash flow, even with owner-paid water, if you've accounted for it up front.
One thing I’d look at is whether utilities are simply being treated as another underwriting variable rather than a deal breaker. In some markets owners commonly cover water or sewer, so the key is whether the purchase price and rents already reflect that reality. I’d be interested to hear how local investors in Cleveland underwrite those expenses and whether they build them into their target cap rate or cash flow requirements.
I have been looking to invest in Cleveland and getting feedback that the tenants don't usually pay for all utilities. It's difficult to cash flow when an investor has to pay for water/sewer expenses. Any feedback regarding that cash flow dilemma?
Still pretty easy to cashflow. You can still back charge tenants for water.
I would be more cognizant of the purchase price you are buying the property for, location, and how new the major mechanicals are. Those are more important for the overall long term health of your investment.
Most Cleveland landlords keep the water and sewer account in their own name. Tenants typically have to put down around a $500 deposit just to start service, which can be a significant upfront expense. Instead, many landlords build the estimated water and sewer cost into the rent to make move-in easier and avoid service interruptions.
I’d build the water/sewer expense into your underwriting from the beginning rather than assuming you’ll be able to pass it through to the tenants.
I'd ask for the seller's actual utility bills for the last 12 months and calculate what that does to your NOI and cash flow. If the deal no longer works once you include the true utility expense, that may be more of a pricing issue than a utility issue.
I’d also look at whether the units are separately metered and talk with a local property manager about what’s customary in that specific area. If owner-paid water/sewer is typical, I’d want my purchase price and projected rents to reflect that reality.
Sometimes a property appears to have great cash flow until you dig into the expenses. I’d rather find that out before making the offer than after closing.