One of the biggest misconceptions in real estate investing is that every apartment building is a good investment.
It isn't.
When I evaluate a multifamily property, I'm looking at questions like:
-Can rents realistically be increased? -How much deferred maintenance is there? -What does occupancy look like? -Is there room to improve operations? -Does the purchase price actually make sense? -Is the location improving or declining?
A property with 100 units isn't necessarily a better investment than one with 20 units.
Right now, I'm spending time analyzing apartment opportunities across Oklahoma and building relationships with owners and investors. Every deal teaches me something new.
For those who own multifamily properties:
What has been the biggest lesson you've learned from buying or operating apartments?
One lesson I've learned is that you make your money when you buy, not when you sell.
A beautiful apartment building with a poor basis can be a far worse investment than an older property purchased at the right price with upside. I also spend a lot of time looking beyond the numbers. Is the neighborhood attracting new employers? Are there infrastructure improvements planned? What's the long-term demand for housing in the area?
I've also found that management can make or break a deal. Two nearly identical properties can produce dramatically different returns simply because one has better management, tighter expense controls, and a proactive approach to tenant retention.
At the end of the day, I'd rather own a well-managed 20-unit property with strong fundamentals than a 100-unit building that's struggling with occupancy, deferred maintenance, and unrealistic rent projections.
One lesson I've learned is that you make your money when you buy, not when you sell.
A beautiful apartment building with a poor basis can be a far worse investment than an older property purchased at the right price with upside. I also spend a lot of time looking beyond the numbers. Is the neighborhood attracting new employers? Are there infrastructure improvements planned? What's the long-term demand for housing in the area?
I've also found that management can make or break a deal. Two nearly identical properties can produce dramatically different returns simply because one has better management, tighter expense controls, and a proactive approach to tenant retention.
At the end of the day, I'd rather own a well-managed 20-unit property with strong fundamentals than a 100-unit building that's struggling with occupancy, deferred maintenance, and unrealistic rent projections.
its all in the details, kathy just discussed a deal she looked at recently that ended up not having gutters and causes huge issues even though the place was new....it doesn't matter the deal size its always in the details especially when land basis and redevelopment come into play.
Dalton, one of the biggest lessons I've seen with apartment deals is that the purchase price rarely tells the full story. A property can look attractive on paper and still turn into a headache if the current NOI is overstated, the deferred maintenance is worse than expected, or the rent-growth assumptions are too aggressive.
I’d pay close attention to the gap between physical occupancy and economic occupancy, along with delinquency, concessions, bad debt, payroll, utilities, insurance, property taxes after the sale, and the actual cost of getting units rent-ready. I’d also want to know how much of the upside depends on raising rents versus simply improving collections and operations.
On the tax side, apartment properties can be very efficient because depreciation and a properly completed cost-segregation study may improve early-year after-tax cash flow. But that benefit should support a good deal, not rescue a weak one.