Building small STR cabins on raw land — what would you assess first?

Question

I’m exploring the idea of building a small cluster of short-term rental cabins on a specific parcel of undeveloped land (Northeast / Catskills-type context).

I’m comfortable with the STR side, but I’m intentionally slowing down on the land and build assumptions before moving forward. Beyond zoning and obvious utilities, I’m curious what others here look at early that materially impacts cost, operations, or long-term viability.

For those who’ve built STR cabins from raw or semi-raw land:
– What land issues surprised you most later?
– What do you wish you had evaluated earlier?
– Anything that turned out to matter more than expected (access, slope, siting, maintenance, neighbors, etc.)?

Not looking for deal analysis — more interested in lessons learned before committing. Appreciate any insights.

Thank you

Bryant Brislin · Answer

Environmental: the jurisdiction may have you study and mitigate any impact the project has on the site as far as trees/plants, species, etc. For example, near Joshua Tree National Park they often requite that someone does a desert tortoise study/survey.  Or if there is a wash, it may be considered what the Army Core classifies as a "blue line" and you can't build on it or too close.

Fees: most jurisdictions (cities, counties, et al) have multiple fees associated with new development.  Sometimes it's higher than what you would guess, so try to ascertain those from the city, public works, the utility companies, etc.

Hopefully, you can find a good GC who has built in that specific area and has seen where others have stubbed their toes.