Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

195
Posts
101
Votes
Nicole S.
  • Investor
  • Seattle, WA
101
Votes |
195
Posts

Build Non-Conforming Single Family? Too Risky?

Nicole S.
  • Investor
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

I currently own a single family rental in a single family zone right in the heart of the city of Seattle. The home is old, built in 1919 with original plumbing, wiring and two major floor to ceiling cracks in the foundation. The lot is 6,250 SF and the home is 2,320 SF.  I own it free and clear and I make a pathetic $1,200/month (compared to what I could get if the home weren't in such bad shape). 

The home is not worth rehabbing, I plan to demolish and re-construct. I plan to re-construct another three story, single family home with an attached ADU. I would place one tenant in the top two floors, one in the basement and one in the ADU.

MY QUESTION: the city would probably view this as a triplex which the land is not zoned for. I have been researching and planning this tear down for near a decade and just hired the architect. He tells me re-zoning in Seattle is a nightmare and now with the new rental registration ordinance, the city can inspect and if they do, my non-conforming triplex could  be discovered. Of course for the build the city would get one set of plans and we would operate from another set of plans, not finishing the two additional "units" until after a certificate of occupancy and inspection has been performed. 

Reading posts on here about folks buying non-conforming property suggest that there are appraisal, resale and insurance consequences involved. 

Have I answered my own question here? Do I risk this and build it anyway? It will look like a typical single family from the exterior. Or, do I build a regular single family home and rent it to ONE renter? Seems like such a waste of space and land. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,866
Posts
3,550
Votes
Rick H.#4 Marketing Your Property Contributor
  • Lender
  • Greater LA/Orange County area, CA
3,550
Votes |
3,866
Posts
Rick H.#4 Marketing Your Property Contributor
  • Lender
  • Greater LA/Orange County area, CA
Replied

Sounds like you are suffering a little bit of myopia and attachment to this property. 

Not sure how you acquired, whether purchased, inherited, foreclosed on note, etc. but this may not be the ideal property for you. Would you be open to sell, swap or 1031 tax free exchange it for other assets that perform according to you expectations?

I think the talk about circumventing permits and zoning is either venting about the frustration of the situation or that you're running out of ideas and energy. 

Is demolishing the property and dealing with city hall, zoning politics ano building inspectors appealing to you? My vote is to put your creative energies and capital into a project that you can get excited about. Perhaps in the suburbs where rent control won't put a cap on your returns. 

Give yourself permission to take another tact, especially after ten years of noodling this thing. It's getting too much free rent in your head.

Loading replies...