Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
0
Votes
Joseph Brown
  • Gainesville, FL
0
Votes |
6
Posts

Subject To on Underwater Property

Joseph Brown
  • Gainesville, FL
Posted

A friend of mine filed bankruptcy in 2009, surrendering his interest in his home and thereby eliminating his personal liability on his mortgage note. After five years, the lender still has not foreclosed and my friend still owns the property.

The fact that he still owns the property is a burden, and it is preventing him from buying his new home and he is still liable for the upkeep of the surrendered property.

He asked if I would be interested in having him quitclaim the deed to me for $100, so I could then rent out the property. He needs to get the property out of his name, and this seems like a viable solution.

Theoretically, this would simply be a subject to deal, where I am buying the home for $100 subject to the existing financing. My friend does not care, as his personal liability on the existing financing was already eliminated by the bankruptcy.

The estimated current market value for the property is between $93 and $97k, and the balance on the note is $138,000.

Any thoughts on this fact pattern? Seems like an opportunity to at least rent the property for a period of time while awaiting the foreclosure, which has yet to be commenced.

Loading replies...