Performing Notes in Today’s Market – Who’s Actively Buying, Holding, or Creating Them

Performing Notes in Today’s Market – Who’s Actively Buying, Holding, or Creating Them

Member since 2026 · 35 posts · 12 votes

2026 feels different for performing note investing – noticeably fewer individual investors active compared to prior years. Note buyer pools shrinking, less forum chatter, slower response rates on outreach.

Potential 2026 factors pushing investors out:

  • Syndication/private equity returns beating passive notes?
  • Servicing costs spiking with higher rates?
  • Institutional funds dominating retail opportunities?
  • Tax code changes or compliance burdens?
  • Better risk-adjusted plays in ops-heavy deals?

Active note buyers – reality check:

  • Fewer competing bidders in your deals this year?
  • Target yields up/down vs. 2024-2025?
  • Paper availability drying up or just pricing issues?
  • Still viable for smaller investors ($50K-500K notes)?

Share your 2026 experience – dying niche or mispriced opportunity? One data point (yield shift, buyer count drop) appreciated.

#NoteInvesting #PerformingNotes #2026Trends

0Reply
112 views

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Member since 2024 · 187 posts · 64 votes
    9mo

    @Frances Cammack Welcome!  We discussed this in great detail in ep 149 at the end of 2025. 

  • James JonesPro Member
    Investor · Collierville, TN 38017 · Member since 2017 · 968 posts · 661 votes
    9mo

    I’m still active, but the profile of what works has changed.

    I don’t think performing notes are dying, but they’re no longer a casual, low-touch yield play for small investors the way they were 3–5 years ago.

    What I’m seeing in 2025–2026:

    • Servicing and compliance costs matter now. They eat disproportionately into smaller balances, which quietly pushes out <$100k note buyers.

    • Paper quality hasn’t disappeared, but pricing discipline has. A lot of sellers are anchored to 2021 pricing while risk is higher. That creates fewer clearing trades, not fewer opportunities.

    • Institutions aren’t killing the space, but they are compressing the middle. They want scale and clean pools, which leaves one-offs and edge cases for experienced operators only.

    • Notes now compete with ops-heavy real estate that throws off real cash flow. If you’re already built for ops, it’s hard to justify thinner, capped yields.

    For smaller investors, I think performing notes are still viable only if:

    • You have scale or shared servicing

    • You’re buying at real discounts, not spreadsheet yields

    • You understand exit risk, not just coupon rate

    Net-net: not a dying niche, but no longer beginner-friendly or passive in practice. It’s a precision tool now, not a broad strategy.”

    • Member since 2026 · 35 posts · 12 votes
      9mo
      Quote from @James Jones:

      I’m still active, but the profile of what works has changed.

      I don’t think performing notes are dying, but they’re no longer a casual, low-touch yield play for small investors the way they were 3–5 years ago.

      What I’m seeing in 2025–2026:

      • Servicing and compliance costs matter now. They eat disproportionately into smaller balances, which quietly pushes out <$100k note buyers.

      • Paper quality hasn’t disappeared, but pricing discipline has. A lot of sellers are anchored to 2021 pricing while risk is higher. That creates fewer clearing trades, not fewer opportunities.

      • Institutions aren’t killing the space, but they are compressing the middle. They want scale and clean pools, which leaves one-offs and edge cases for experienced operators only.

      • Notes now compete with ops-heavy real estate that throws off real cash flow. If you’re already built for ops, it’s hard to justify thinner, capped yields.

      For smaller investors, I think performing notes are still viable only if:

      • You have scale or shared servicing

      • You’re buying at real discounts, not spreadsheet yields

      • You understand exit risk, not just coupon rate

      Net-net: not a dying niche, but no longer beginner-friendly or passive in practice. It’s a precision tool now, not a broad strategy.”

      Thank you James for the detailed breakdown.

      Appreciate you sharing the real 2025-2026 shifts. The servicing cost squeeze on smaller notes, pricing anchor issues, and ops competition make total sense. "Precision tool, not broad strategy" perfectly captures why participation dropped.

      Key takeaways I'm noting:

      <$100K notes getting squeezed out by compliance
      Need real discounts beyond spreadsheet math
      Exit risk > coupon rate for sustainability
  • Investor · Member since 2024 · 187 posts · 64 votes
    9mo

    @James Jones When we got started in 2010, institutions were barely involved after that they got heavy.  They have since adjusted and a lot of them are diving into different types of notes.  For the smaller players after 2018, it shifted from NPLs to PLs mostly.  I think pricing is stuck due to the quantity of paper vs the quality.  Shift from buying Intuitional to non-QM was the biggest shift in quality.  

  • Investor · Member since 2024 · 187 posts · 64 votes
    9mo

    @Frances Cammack
    In Ep 149 of our Real estate Notes show Podcast we had a servicer on who shared all the struggles that 2025 had and where the shift went to.  You have to be careful as newer investors are not understanding the paper they are buying nor using servicers out of saving on costs. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.