Updated about 2 months ago on . Most recent reply
How to understand the 70% Rule
A concept that comes up often in real estate investing is the “70% rule.”
For anyone new, it’s a quick way investors estimate what they should pay for a property when planning to renovate and resell.
The basic idea is:
Maximum Offer = (After Repair Value × 70%) – Repair Costs
Here’s a simple example:
If a property will be worth $200,000 after repairs, and it needs $40,000 in work:
$200,000 × 70% = $140,000
$140,000 – $40,000 = $100,000
In this case, an investor might aim to buy the property around $100,000 or less.
Why 70%?
That remaining 30% is meant to cover:
• Closing costs
• Holding costs
• Selling costs
• Profit margin
• Unexpected expenses
It’s not a perfect formula, and it can change depending on the market, but it’s a helpful starting point for quick analysis.
Over time, many investors adjust this percentage based on their experience, risk tolerance, and local conditions.
For those who use this rule regularly:
Do you stick close to 70%, or adjust it based on the deal and market?
Most Popular Reply
I don't use it at all. I always do an actual analysis with real numbers. Using lazy rules can cause you to lose out on good/great deals and waste time working through ones you shouldn't have. Just do the work from the start and stop trying to cut corners.



