Would you raise good tenants straight to market, or phase?
Hi everyone,
Quick follow-up to my last post.
Our other unit is rented at $1,980, and current market is closer to $2,400 as-is. The tenants are good long-term tenants, so I’m trying to think through the right move.
Since this is an freshly acquired owner-occupied duplex, it looks like we may be exempt from Washington’s 10% annual rent increase limit. That gives us flexibility, but I’m more interested in what experienced landlords think is the smart move, not just the legal one.
If you were in this spot, would you leave it alone for stability, raise it gradually, or move it to market once the lease allows? (12 months)
Trying to balance fairness, keeping a good tenant, and making sure this property actually helps us get to the next one.
Thanks in advance.
Most Popular Reply
Run the math on both scenarios before you decide. The gap is $420 a month, so about $5,000 a year. Sounds like a lot until you price out what happens if they leave.
On my duplexes I've tracked turnover cost at around $3,000-4,000 per unit when you add up make-ready, contractor time, vacancy during the turn, and any marketing or leasing costs. In a market like Seattle that number is probably higher. And that's before you account for the risk of a worse tenant next time around.
I'd bump it to $2,150-2,200 at renewal and see how they respond. That's a meaningful increase and they'll still feel like they're getting a deal relative to market. Then bring it closer to $2,400 on the next cycle. Two moves over two years gets you there without gambling a proven tenant. The math usually favors keeping someone who pays on time and doesn't trash the place over chasing the last $200 a month.
