Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 2 days ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
4
Votes
David Blake
  • Specialist
  • Sheridan, WY
4
Votes |
12
Posts

Is Future Scarcity More Important Than Occupancy?

David Blake
  • Specialist
  • Sheridan, WY
Posted

Most STR investors focus on occupancy, ADR, and annual revenue when evaluating a market.

But I've started paying increasing attention to something else:

Future scarcity.

While researching Springdale, Utah (gateway to Zion National Park), one thing stood out:

New short-term rental permits are effectively frozen.

That changes the investment equation.

When future supply is constrained, existing compliant properties may become more valuable because future investors may not be able to enter the market under the same conditions.

In other words, you're not just buying a property.

You're potentially buying access to a limited supply pool.

It got me wondering:

Have any of you invested in markets where permit caps, zoning restrictions, or regulatory changes ended up benefiting existing operators?

I'd be interested to hear examples.

Loading replies...