Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

7
Posts
1
Votes
Frank D'Amato
  • Rehabber
  • Louisville, KY
1
Votes |
7
Posts

Passive income: tax liens vs rentals

Frank D'Amato
  • Rehabber
  • Louisville, KY
Posted

I an a newish investor and new to BP. My question:

In looking to build passive income. . . why would I choose a rental over a tax lien? I'm here in Kentucky, and the interest return rate is 12%. Which is what one can reasonably expect from a rental, a bit more or less, right? Yet, there's no upkeep, no finding renters, no roof flying off, etc. Plus you get the bonus of a possibility of getting the house if the tax lien isn't repaid. The upside I see to the rental is the appreciation of the house.

Of course, I've never bought a tax lien before, so I don't know what that's like. But from the outside, it seems easier.

Seems like an easy choice: tax lien...so what am I missing? What else do I need to consider?

Thanks!

Frank

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,784
Posts
1,019
Votes
Michael Seeker
  • Investor
  • Louisville, KY
1,019
Votes |
1,784
Posts
Michael Seeker
  • Investor
  • Louisville, KY
Replied
Originally posted by @Frank D'Amato:
I an a newish investor and new to BP. My question:

In looking to build passive income. . . why would I choose a rental over a tax lien? I'm here in Kentucky, and the interest return rate is 12%. Which is what one can reasonably expect from a rental, a bit more or less, right? Yet, there's no upkeep, no finding renters, no roof flying off, etc. Plus you get the bonus of a possibility of getting the house if the tax lien isn't repaid. The upside I see to the rental is the appreciation of the house.

Of course, I've never bought a tax lien before, so I don't know what that's like. But from the outside, it seems easier.

Seems like an easy choice: tax lien...so what am I missing? What else do I need to consider?

Thanks!

Frank

You may have trouble utilizing leverage. I'm not sure, but I don't know that you could buy a $100K tax lien with $20K out of pocket. There are many benefits to rental properties above and beyond the initial cash-on-cash returns. You already mentioned appreciation, but a few other big ones are the debt pay-down, interest deduction, increased rents and depreciation. Let's say you've got a $100K tax lien yielding 12% or $100K to invest in rental property that will yield 12%. Using 20% down on a commercial (5+ unit property) this would buy you about $500K worth of rental units. You may net the same $12K income (I would expect more out of a $500K rental), BUT the rental will throw off ~$15K of depreciation, meaning you don't pay any taxes on that $12K and also about $5K of loan paydown per year.

You should do more research on tax liens to see if any similar benefits are available in that arena.

Loading replies...