Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

116
Posts
103
Votes
Ezra Nugroho
  • Investor
  • Milpitas, CA
103
Votes |
116
Posts

Is No or Low Money Down Too Risky for Buy and Hold?

Ezra Nugroho
  • Investor
  • Milpitas, CA
Posted

Hi BPers,

Generally it is well accepted maxim in BP that any buy and hold investors should have a reasonable amount of reserve for our properties just in case something goes wrong. 

With that in mind, wouldn't buying rental with no/little money down be too risky as well? BP has now published a book on this. I haven't gotten it yet, so I cannot tell if the book covers the risk mitigation for this strategy. I can understand how a flip may work well between a sweat partner and a money partner. But for a buy and hold? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,143
Posts
1,064
Votes
Jeff S.
  • Specialist
  • Portland, OR
1,064
Votes |
3,143
Posts
Jeff S.
  • Specialist
  • Portland, OR
Replied

@Ezra Nugroho how would that be risky? The less you put down the more cash you have. That is less risky for you. If you are able to walk away for some reason (think sink hole) and the bank doesn't come after you then you have less to lose.

It is risky for the bank. It is risky for whatever investor has loaned you the money because the less skin in the game the buyer has the higher the possibility you would give up if things go wrong.

Loading replies...