Hello so I have been hearing a lot of conflicting info about these % rules that we use and was hoping to see if someone could clarify between each one and what is one that I should maybe lean on more in property evaluating. Thanks to all of you!
You need to provide a bit more detail in what you're looking into evaluating. Are you looking for a buy & hold property or a rehab property?
Buy and hold people generally tend to use the 1% rule (although 2% would be better). Ie; Total investment cost = $100K, then 1% = $1K per month rent MINIMUM to even consider the property. More is better obviously.
Rehab properties would generally follow a different rule. You want to buy at 70% or below ARV (After renovation value) _AFTER_ the renovation costs. Ie; ARV is $200K, Repairs cost $50K, 70% of $200K = $140K - $50K, which means an offer of $90K or less for that house.
50% pertains to the buy & hold properties. It's just a rough estimate of what you will spend on monthly operating costs from your rent collected. Ie; $1K per month rent = $500 per month towards taxes, insurance, management, capital expenditure, electricity, heat, sewer, water, lawn care, etc. But does _NOT_ include cost of money (mortgages, etc).
Hope this helps a bit. Keep browsing the site, I'm sure these %s are ALL over the place.
Have a good one!
Free eBook from BiggerPockets!
- Actionable advice for getting started,
- Discover the 10 Most Lucrative Real Estate Niches,
- Learn how to get started with or without money,
- Explore Real-Life Strategies for Building Wealth,
- And a LOT more.
Sign up below to download the eBook for FREE today!
We hate spam just as much as you
You must be a BiggerPockets member to post on the forums
Join the world's largest, most open Real Estate Investing Community online, 100% free forever!