I'm afraid people are making a huge mistake of seeing the next recession as binary, if x happens then y happens because they're inversely correlated. In other words, if a recession hits (x) the value of my cash increases or housing prices go down in terms of dollars (y).
While this is possible, it's not guaranteed. History shows us steep recessions and depressions rarely occur for reasons people expect and rarely unfold the way people imagine. They have a saying "the market will do what ever necessary to hurt the most amount of people."
Let's first look at a very meaningful chart of government deficits. Notice deficits usually rise during recessions and contract during booms, and never before in US history, have deficits been this high (4.6% of GDP) without being in a recession.

This means the US is currently running recession level deficits, only seen twice since 1950, at a time when the economy is "booming" and unemployment is near an all time low, as Trump reminds us via twitter by the hour.
And remember the US is at almost 110% debt to GDP, a feat never accomplished outside a world war and not seen since the early 1940's. This is extremely important because a war is a one time expense, like buying office furniture. The deficits now aren't one time expenses, they're recurring, like payroll.
Going back to the chart please notice the last recession the deficit increased by approx 9%.
So what happens when we're currently running a 4.6% deficit in a good economy, with very low unemployment, and the next recession hits? Above 50% probability the deficit goes north of 10% of GDP. But wait, debt to GDP is already at levels only seen in war when it's a one time cost.
What happened to the national debt during/since the last recession when we've run deficits between 10% and 2%? Here's another chart.

The national debt more than doubled. So what would the national debt do in the next recession if deficits stayed consistently at or above 10%. The debt would likely double every 5 -7 years...optimistically.
What does this have to do with the original question, "would you like to see a recession?"
It has more to do with everyone's answer 1. No I'm not a masochist or 2. Yes, I'd like a recession so my cash buys more house.
But what if the next recession wasn't binary? What if there's a 3rd possible outcome?
Let's look at the 1970's and stagflation. This was an inflationary recession, high inflation with high unemployment. American's cash lost 50% of it's purchasing power in 5 years. The US had to issue "Carter Bonds" (bonds issued in swiss francs) because no one wanted bond's denominated in the pariah currency of the time...the US dollar.
What happened to housing prices? See chart

Even adjusted for inflation, they rose.
I'm by no means suggesting you run out and buy properties now because there's no downside. Far from it. What I am saying is with staggering national debt, huge deficits (in a "good" economy), and the only out for the government being inflation, in the next recession, 1970's inflation has a lot of tailwind.
And if you're holding cash, waiting for the next recession, you'll get crushed. Imagine loosing half the your money in 5 years waiting for home prices to come down.
In an inflationary recession cash is far from king.
I think I'm one of the very few investors on BP that look at REI from a top down perspective, so just wanted to provide some food for thought for the rest of the community who looks at things bottoms up.
George