Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

18
Posts
5
Votes
John Winters
5
Votes |
18
Posts

$$ WILL THIS WORK? (2 for 1, or 50% Paid, then Use Equity?)

John Winters
Posted

Greetings BP,

I'm a HS teacher & NEW investor in PA. I see a few property packages and a single-family properties of interest, some above the FHA caps, but worth what's being asked. Of course I will only buy a property or package of properties that will pay for themselves, so I am not overly concerned with paying for them over time, & I am approved at the max FHA rates for single family & multi-units. However, to pay for properties over the caps (package or single) -- with motivated sellers -- would something like this be possible, if agreed upon?

**Single property:  Buy property at half-asking price with an fha (or conventional) loan.  Make it 'subject to' me taking a loan from the instant equity to pay the seller the other half.

**Property package: Pay the price of one property at asking price with fha (or conventional) loan, seller agrees to deed both/all properties to me, 'subject to' me using instant equity to pay the remaining price for the remaining original asking balance.

Is this legal & workable if the seller agrees?  Are there any challenges/obstacles to this approach, if agreed upon?  (I know the lending institutions will typically lend a percentage, I think ~80%, of the appraised value.). I feel like there must be a 'catch' to this approach - something obvious (or not) that I'm missing.  However, if this is possible, great!  I'm guessing a real estate attorney would be the best person to draw up this type of contract? I'm new & learning, and I appreciate all support and tips.  Btw, I'm okay with using the current equity, as long as the cash-flow is positive. Thank you for any and all insight, even if it may seem obvious!