Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 month ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
2
Votes
Amritpreet Singh
2
Votes |
11
Posts

Morby method/stacking need a reliable lender

Amritpreet Singh
Posted

Anybody know a lender who do the Morby method/stacking? Basically structure a deal where the seller gets 70% from my lender and I finance the 30% with the seller. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,774
Posts
2,625
Votes
Stuart Udis
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
2,625
Votes |
1,774
Posts
Stuart Udis
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
Replied

So now this is the “Morby Method”? At this point what real estate strategy is he not responsible for :) Call it what it is: a seller-financed second sitting behind the first-position lender, adding up to 100% financing. I don’t see any bank touching that structure. At best, maybe an expensive private or alternative lender would consider it, but even that’s a stretch.

In my opinion and most importantly beyond the financing hurdles, you have to ask why a seller is willing to carry a 30% second up to the full purchase price instead of selling the property in a normal, arms-length transaction. It’s usually because the real estate is challenged or overpriced, and these terms are the only way they can get someone to take it.

There was a Pace minion on here last year who insisted he’d buy underwater real estate financed at 100% as long as the property cash flowed.  That’s exactly why I’m skeptical of anyone following Pace’s tutelage—the logic behind these deals are inherently flawed but that's how he makes money. It's easier to get people to pay up for his education when they are being told they can buy real estate with zero money. 

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...