Inheriting RE - taxes, ownership, advice in General

Inheriting RE - taxes, ownership, advice in General

Adger, AL · Member since 2016 · 34 posts · 2 votes

Although the tax reform bill is still in conference and hasn't been passed, and the final bill will require study in conjunction with a discussion with a real estate savvy CPA to understand its implications on my particular real estate question, I am hoping someone on this thread can weigh in with some general advice. Please excuse the long post.

My close friend's parents are "buy and hold" small time landlords with a 2 commercial (1 building has three units and the other is one contiguous space) and 4 residential properties they rent out. These properties are all held jointly by their parents in their parent's names only, but each property has good liability insurance and umbrella policies.

The parents structured ownership in their name only this way partly because they were not convinced that since they handle maintenance, tenant vetting, etc themselves., that LLCs were worth setting up for each property. That there wouldn't be a huge benefit to it. With such hands on management the corporate veil protection of an LLC could be easily pierced was part of the reasoning. However, one of the residential buildings is currently held in a partnership with the parents, and their two siblings.

There are no separate bank accounts for these properties and money is just being deposited into one account., which I think needs addressing. These buildings bring in good rent, are centrally located in a major city, are well kept, and were a side business for the parents when they were working. This year they retired and are living on rental income from these properties. They've never really been strict about all the itemized deductions as landlords they could be taking (travel expenses, repairs etc.) or used spreadsheets to track things like rent. They were basically accidental landlords, who worked hard at their other professions, who were lucky to have good tenants.

These building will pass down to the sibling ( my friend) and his brother as inheritance and will be 50/50 ownership. They would like to continue on managing them. The siblings are trying to get up to speed on being future landlords. They've created excel spreadsheets to track expenses and rent. Encouraged separate bank accounts. Kept receipts for maintenance to itemize deductions etc., but I am curious as to some suggestions for the most tax advantageous methods they should be transferred the siblings.

Should ownership be transferred via forming partnerships (or LLCs? or S Corps?) for the all properties currently held in name only while the parents are living or should they just wait until after their parents have passed to assume ownership (the properties are held in a revocable trust where the siblings would simply inherit them)?

In any case, once these properties are theirs solely, should they continue to be held in name only but with high insurance polices as they are now? Or in an LLC(s)? Or Series LLC? Or in an LLC elected to be taxed as an s corp? Basically what would be a tax advantageous set up?

Any tips on property management or other way for them to get up to speed on inheriting these buildings. and how they should prepare themselves, both from a management and tax perspective would be appreciated as well.

I know a CPA is going to need to wade into the nitty gritty, as this is a complex set of questions, but any general advice is appreciated. Thank you.

0Reply
11 views

Most Popular Reply

Ashish AcharyaBusiness Member
CPA, CFP®, PFS · FL · Member since 2017 · 5k+ posts · 3k+ votes
8y

Aubrey, 

Q; There are no separate bank accounts for these properties and money is just being deposited into one account. Which I think needs addressing.

  • Answer – I see you say this needs addressing because they are commingling the funds. I too think keeping separate accounts makes life easier for a bookkeeping but is not necessary for them. Just keeping a good record of the cash movements is fine. However, commingling is most relevant and necessary when you are conducting a business via business entities. Right now, they are not.
  • Not commingling a fund right now is just going to be good business practice and easy for bookkeeping and is not going to impact you from liability perspective even if you were actually commingling.

Q: These building will pass down to the sibling (my friend) and his brother as inheritance and will be 50/50 ownership …. Encouraged separate bank accounts.

  1. Answer- Yeah, once they start doing a business via entity, separate bank accounts as you suggested is required.

Q: Should ownership be transferred via forming partnerships (or LLCs? or S Corps?) for the all properties currently held in name only while the parents are living or should they just wait until after their parents have passed to assume ownership (the properties are held in a revocable trust where the siblings would simply inherit them)?

  • If the property is gifted, there is no stepped-up basis, which would be beneficial to the brothers.
  • The best way would be to acquire the property via inheritance so that bothers get stepped up basis.
  • We can make this all complicated with trust and stuff if needed.
  • Sometimes State transfer taxes can be minimized by transferring property to a single-member LLC and then selling the LLC interest instead of the property. This works in a state that provides for only a nominal fee or tax on the transfer of property to a partnership or LLC when the transferor controls the transferee entity.

Q: In any case, once these properties are theirs solely, should they continue to be held in name only but with high insurance polices as they are now? Or in an LLC(s)? Or Series LLC? Or in an LLC elected to be taxed as an s corp? Basically what would be a tax advantageous set up?

  • Answer: LLC is more of an asset protection vehicle rather than the tax saving. However, there are some tax advantages for choosing LLC over S-crop for rental activities.
  • The main reason people elect S-crop in RE business is to avoid SE taxes( self-employment taxes). When you flip a property, the gain is treated as ordinary income so have to pay SE tax. However, rental income is passive income (unless you provide substantial service like cleaning or maid service, seen in AIRBNB activity) and you don’t have to pay SE tax on rental passive income, so electing S-corp for rental portfolio does no good. Also
  • 1) If you intend to hold rental under S-corp for a long time, then you can elect S-corp. however, if you do not, transferring an asset from S-corp to partners for various reason is a taxable event. (You transfer property from Scorp to you, you don't receive any money, but your taxes might be thousands of dollar if there was substantial gain when you transfer.) Whereas in LLC, transferring asset is not a taxable event, it normally just reduces partner's basis in the partnership.
  • 2) If you elect S-corp, and if ever wanted to draw let's say $5000k from S-corp for personal use (vacation), you have to distribute the proportionate amount to all other partners of the S-corp too. Whereas in LLC, each partner can withdraw what they want and only his/her basis would be impacted.
  • 3) In S-corp, you act as both employee and investor. So you cannot deduct any loss greater than your investment or basis in S-corp just like when you buy stocks in the public company, the max you can lose is your money you invested in the stock. Whereas in LLC there is no limitation because the business loss and gain are pass through. There are some exceptions regarding at-risk concepts.
  • Also, let’s not forget about the all the payroll compliance and other compliance for S-crop.

Hope that was helpful. 

INVESTOR FRIENDLY CPA®5241 Reviews
TaxMD™ | AI-Powered Tax Planning
See this reply in the discussion

4 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Ashish AcharyaBusiness Member
    CPA, CFP®, PFS · FL · Member since 2017 · 5k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    8y

    Aubrey, 

    Q; There are no separate bank accounts for these properties and money is just being deposited into one account. Which I think needs addressing.

    • Answer – I see you say this needs addressing because they are commingling the funds. I too think keeping separate accounts makes life easier for a bookkeeping but is not necessary for them. Just keeping a good record of the cash movements is fine. However, commingling is most relevant and necessary when you are conducting a business via business entities. Right now, they are not.
    • Not commingling a fund right now is just going to be good business practice and easy for bookkeeping and is not going to impact you from liability perspective even if you were actually commingling.

    Q: These building will pass down to the sibling (my friend) and his brother as inheritance and will be 50/50 ownership …. Encouraged separate bank accounts.

    1. Answer- Yeah, once they start doing a business via entity, separate bank accounts as you suggested is required.

    Q: Should ownership be transferred via forming partnerships (or LLCs? or S Corps?) for the all properties currently held in name only while the parents are living or should they just wait until after their parents have passed to assume ownership (the properties are held in a revocable trust where the siblings would simply inherit them)?

    • If the property is gifted, there is no stepped-up basis, which would be beneficial to the brothers.
    • The best way would be to acquire the property via inheritance so that bothers get stepped up basis.
    • We can make this all complicated with trust and stuff if needed.
    • Sometimes State transfer taxes can be minimized by transferring property to a single-member LLC and then selling the LLC interest instead of the property. This works in a state that provides for only a nominal fee or tax on the transfer of property to a partnership or LLC when the transferor controls the transferee entity.

    Q: In any case, once these properties are theirs solely, should they continue to be held in name only but with high insurance polices as they are now? Or in an LLC(s)? Or Series LLC? Or in an LLC elected to be taxed as an s corp? Basically what would be a tax advantageous set up?

    • Answer: LLC is more of an asset protection vehicle rather than the tax saving. However, there are some tax advantages for choosing LLC over S-crop for rental activities.
    • The main reason people elect S-crop in RE business is to avoid SE taxes( self-employment taxes). When you flip a property, the gain is treated as ordinary income so have to pay SE tax. However, rental income is passive income (unless you provide substantial service like cleaning or maid service, seen in AIRBNB activity) and you don’t have to pay SE tax on rental passive income, so electing S-corp for rental portfolio does no good. Also
    • 1) If you intend to hold rental under S-corp for a long time, then you can elect S-corp. however, if you do not, transferring an asset from S-corp to partners for various reason is a taxable event. (You transfer property from Scorp to you, you don't receive any money, but your taxes might be thousands of dollar if there was substantial gain when you transfer.) Whereas in LLC, transferring asset is not a taxable event, it normally just reduces partner's basis in the partnership.
    • 2) If you elect S-corp, and if ever wanted to draw let's say $5000k from S-corp for personal use (vacation), you have to distribute the proportionate amount to all other partners of the S-corp too. Whereas in LLC, each partner can withdraw what they want and only his/her basis would be impacted.
    • 3) In S-corp, you act as both employee and investor. So you cannot deduct any loss greater than your investment or basis in S-corp just like when you buy stocks in the public company, the max you can lose is your money you invested in the stock. Whereas in LLC there is no limitation because the business loss and gain are pass through. There are some exceptions regarding at-risk concepts.
    • Also, let’s not forget about the all the payroll compliance and other compliance for S-crop.

    Hope that was helpful. 

    INVESTOR FRIENDLY CPA®5241 Reviews
    TaxMD™ | AI-Powered Tax Planning
  • Lance LvovskyPro Member
    Accountant · Fort Lauderdale, FL · Member since 2013 · 1k+ posts · 753 votes
    8y

    @Aubrey P. I skimmed your post as you included a lot of details. I will say you want to discuss this with a CPA. A good CPA is well worth the price you will pay. With that being said, some general advice I have which applies to a typical situation, not just your situation, is that properties held in entities generally should be held in LLC's. The step up in basis in an LLC allows the values of the Real Estate properties to have a step up in basis to Fair Market Value at date of death. On the flip side, Real Estate held in an S Corp does not get such benefits. Although there may be a step up in basis of the S Corp Stock, this does not help the beneficiary in the form of additional depreciation deductions, etc.

    Another piece of advice. Depending on the decedent's specific situation, an Estate tax return might need to be filed (Form 706). Also, any taxable gifts made during his/her lifetime would need to be disclosed on a gift tax return.

    Hope this helps.

  • Adger, AL · Member since 2016 · 34 posts · 2 votes
    8y

    Thanks, all. Incredibly useful advice Ashish and Lance!

  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    8y

    @Aubrey P.

    I want to emphasize the critical part in @Ashish Acharya and @Lance Lvovsky answers and make sure you understand how important it is: the step-up basis.

    Say the parents spent $500k buying these properties at some point in the past, and today these properties are worth $1.5 mil.  If they transfer the properties to the children now, the children's tax basis is $500k. If they turn around and sell the properties, they have to pay taxes on $1 mil capital gain.

    In contrast, if the properties stay in parents' name and eventually transfer to the children via inheritance, the chidren's tax basis is $1.5 mil (or whatever the market value is at the time). If they sell the properties then - they pay ZERO capital gain taxes. This is what is called "step-up basis", and it is a huge deal. So do NOT transfer the properties now.

    One exception to this advice would be if the parents are trying to get rid of their assets to qualify for Medicaid later on. Then the children suffer capital gain taxes as trade-off.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.