Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

presented by

User Stats

11
Posts
4
Votes
Scott McCadden
  • Investor
  • Sykesville, MD
4
Votes |
11
Posts

No Deductions Allowed to Agent Investor

Scott McCadden
  • Investor
  • Sykesville, MD
Posted

As part of my regular routine of checking the "tax news", I came across a recently released tax court case, TC Summary Opinion 2018-27.  

Bottom line, a licensed real estate agent deducted mileage for visiting houses for possible investment, never invested in any houses and the IRS audited his returns.  Despite already being a licensed real estate agent, the deductions were disallowed because the business of real estate investing never got started.

Official government source material: https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/UstcInOp/OpinionViewer....

Good write up by a tax professional: https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/blog...

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,494
Posts
6,576
Votes
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
6,576
Votes |
5,494
Posts
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
Replied

@Scott McCadden

Thanks for sharing, Scott.

This is an extremely interesting case, because many tax professionals, myself included, would disagree with the Court's interpretation of whether their business has commenced. More importantly - 100% of the investors would disagree.

Which is why reading this case is so important! Not only the IRS takes a strong position that no income = no business - but the Tax Court sided with the IRS! They even added penalties, denying "in good faith" argument from the taxpayer. Agree or not agree - this is the result to be expected if you follow the same path.

Lesson:

Don't be greedy! Spending and deducting $40,000 of expenses over two years of $0 income is a recipe for disaster.

PS. Spending $40,000 to make $0 in two years is also a pretty awful business model.

  • Michael Plaks
  • Loading replies...