Not sure if my rental property is worth keeping

Not sure if my rental property is worth keeping

San Antonio. Tx · Member since 2018 · 75 posts · 47 votes

SFH, I bought it almost 5 years ago (Dec 2021) & since then have made $20K in capital improvements. I didn't intend to be a landlord, I bought the house as my primary. After a year living there circumstances had me permanently move away to a different area. Its been a rental for about last four years. Surprisingly no tenant issues, it's been smooth sailing.

But here are the downsides:

In a city that has no growth & property values either stay the same or go down - so no hope of appreciation.

Taxes & insurance combined go up about $1000 per year & keep climbing. Insurance is sky high anyway because it's in a hurricane zone ( it's 3x the amount of my primary homeowners insurance which is inland 2 hours north & not in hurricane zone-- for comparison). BTW the taxes & insurance are 35% of my mortgage payment. I would be surprised if they keep climbing & reach 50%. I don't know how the assessor gets away with increasing property values every year when all sales data  is way below their assessments.

Home is aging so it's more upkeep ( since I've owned it I put in new flooring, new roof, new appliances, new water heater, new windows, fixed dropping & aging fence).

so basically costs continue to climb but home values doesn't move. In this market is worth pretty much what I bought it for 5 years ago. I have gained nothing.

i don't see any upside to owning it long-term. Are there any reasons I might be missing to keep it?

I'm seriously thinking of selling it soon. But it's a big decision so try to get perspective.

1Reply
229 views

Most Popular Reply

Jay HurstBusiness Member
Lender · Dallas, TX · Member since 2017 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
5mo
Quote from @Mica Moore:

SFH, I bought it almost 5 years ago (Dec 2021) & since then have made $20K in capital improvements. I didn't intend to be a landlord, I bought the house as my primary. After a year living there circumstances had me permanently move away to a different area. Its been a rental for about last four years. Surprisingly no tenant issues, it's been smooth sailing.

But here are the downsides:

In a city that has no growth & property values either stay the same or go down - so no hope of appreciation.

Taxes & insurance combined go up about $1000 per year & keep climbing. Insurance is sky high anyway because it's in a hurricane zone ( it's 3x the amount of my primary homeowners insurance which is inland 2 hours north & not in hurricane zone-- for comparison). BTW the taxes & insurance are 35% of my mortgage payment. I would be surprised if they keep climbing & reach 50%. I don't know how the assessor gets away with increasing property values every year when all sales data  is way below their assessments.

Home is aging so it's more upkeep ( since I've owned it I put in new flooring, new roof, new appliances, new water heater, new windows, fixed dropping & aging fence).

so basically costs continue to climb but home values doesn't move. In this market is worth pretty much what I bought it for 5 years ago. I have gained nothing.

i don't see any upside to owning it long-term. Are there any reasons I might be missing to keep it?

I'm seriously thinking of selling it soon. But it's a big decision so try to get perspective.


 Have you challenged yuor assessed value?  if the comps are lower then your assesed value and you have deferred maintence you should be to challange the assesment. Even if successful this property might not be worth keeping, but a lot of investors with high taxes do not bother to challange and it always makes me scratch my head. Absentee landlords are the taxing authorities fav target because they rarely fight back. 

Hurst Real Estate, INC4.987 Reviews
See this reply in the discussion

12 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    5mo

    I think you answered your question. If you do not see the upside and there's no appreciation in that area, you would be better off selling, even if you didn't make any money, and saving, or, if you make money, use it to invest in something that would be considered a better investment. 

    7e investments53 Reviews
  • Real Estate Broker · Hyde Park Tampa, FL · Member since 2019 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    5mo

    First and foremost, congrats on having a seamless experience as a landlord AND for knowing when to move on.  Both are huge wins.  It's time...

    Best...

  • David PeschioBusiness Member
    Richmond, VA · Member since 2019 · 357 posts · 180 votes
    5mo

    I agree that selling likely makes the most sense in this situation. Between flat appreciation, rising taxes and insurance, and an aging property in a no-growth market, the long-term outlook for holding this asset is not particularly strong.
    Before making a final decision, make sure you have factored in the tax implications. Depreciation recapture can be a significant cost, and depending on your timing, you may still qualify for the homeowner exclusion if you lived in the property for two of the last five years. Even if the gain is small, a breakeven or low-tax exit can be a strategic win if it allows you to put that equity into a stronger market.

  • Bruce WoodruffPro Member
    Contractor/Investor/Consultant · San Diego / Phoenix · Member since 2021 · 12k+ posts · 15k+ votes
    5mo

    Are you sure there will be no appreciation? Ever? Maybe in 5 yrs you make $100k? Texas is gaining many new citizens every year......

    • San Antonio. Tx · Member since 2018 · 75 posts · 47 votes
      5mo
      Quote from @Bruce Woodruff:

      Are you sure there will be no appreciation? Ever? Maybe in 5 yrs you make $100k? Texas is gaining many new citizens every year......

      Yes Im sure. The value hasn't moved a notch since I've owned it. There are new homes popping up.all around that are not much more than this is worth. My neighbor (very good comp) sat on market for 6 months and 2 proce redxtions later & they still sold ot for same amount it was 5 years ago. Some areas of Texas are stagnant ( particularly South Texas). Dismal wages combined with large supply of homes keeps prices flat. 

      It's sad because that last house I lived in ( in another state) doubled in value in theb5 years I lived there.
  • Jay HurstBusiness Member
    Lender · Dallas, TX · Member since 2017 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    5mo
    Quote from @Mica Moore:

    SFH, I bought it almost 5 years ago (Dec 2021) & since then have made $20K in capital improvements. I didn't intend to be a landlord, I bought the house as my primary. After a year living there circumstances had me permanently move away to a different area. Its been a rental for about last four years. Surprisingly no tenant issues, it's been smooth sailing.

    But here are the downsides:

    In a city that has no growth & property values either stay the same or go down - so no hope of appreciation.

    Taxes & insurance combined go up about $1000 per year & keep climbing. Insurance is sky high anyway because it's in a hurricane zone ( it's 3x the amount of my primary homeowners insurance which is inland 2 hours north & not in hurricane zone-- for comparison). BTW the taxes & insurance are 35% of my mortgage payment. I would be surprised if they keep climbing & reach 50%. I don't know how the assessor gets away with increasing property values every year when all sales data  is way below their assessments.

    Home is aging so it's more upkeep ( since I've owned it I put in new flooring, new roof, new appliances, new water heater, new windows, fixed dropping & aging fence).

    so basically costs continue to climb but home values doesn't move. In this market is worth pretty much what I bought it for 5 years ago. I have gained nothing.

    i don't see any upside to owning it long-term. Are there any reasons I might be missing to keep it?

    I'm seriously thinking of selling it soon. But it's a big decision so try to get perspective.


     Have you challenged yuor assessed value?  if the comps are lower then your assesed value and you have deferred maintence you should be to challange the assesment. Even if successful this property might not be worth keeping, but a lot of investors with high taxes do not bother to challange and it always makes me scratch my head. Absentee landlords are the taxing authorities fav target because they rarely fight back. 

    Hurst Real Estate, INC4.987 Reviews
  • Rental Property Investor · Somewhere over the Rainbow · Member since 2021 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    5mo

    What's the location of the property? 

    I'm in the same boat honestly...I'm going to probably sell 3/4 out of my 5. Single based on government standards, allegedly "high earner", W2 worker so I can't take depreciation. so (1) tax benefit is gone. Then (2) insurance and taxes have increased dramatically the last 5 years. The rate of the increase would've been an unreasonable assumption when making the "deal". And aging properties just as you mentioned with upcoming CapEx. You can only kick this can down the road for so long and now (due to increasing costs) you don't have the cashflow to budget for these items. On top of that (4) rent cannot be increased nearly enough to cover the increased expenses.

    I have pivoted away from the traditional SFH LTR model. It really has to be done at scale - aka rental community, townhomes/trailer/manufactured units on small plots that can be sold.

    Flips don't make sense due to short term capital gains, that's 37% gone right there. Then add in the increase in labor costs and the margins are so compressed it's just not there. You would have to essentially increase marketing to intake more leads, make more low ball offers until something sticks. 

    So you're left with STRs - business. Land - subdividing and selling lots. Or larger apartment type complexes. As far as SFH there has to be equity capture at the buy and value add. Then maybe hold/rent for a year and sell.

    Then you have the stock market which has been on an absolute tear. As far as the real estate having the benefit of leverage...you can buy on margin as well. So you can leverage your buying power in the stock market. And AI is still in it's infancy...big opportunities in the next 10 years honestly. In my situation the stock market I beleive would be better. Add in the 8th wonder of the world and you start snowballing fairly quickly. 

    This is all my opinion based on my experience in my location anyway. 

  • San Antonio. Tx · Member since 2018 · 75 posts · 47 votes
    5mo

    Of course I do. It makes little difference in the end. They still inflate values by $30K.

    • Jay HurstBusiness Member
      Lender · Dallas, TX · Member since 2017 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
      5mo
      Quote from @Mica Moore:

      Of course I do. It makes little difference in the end. They still inflate values by $30K.


      Good for you!  Most investors do not. 

      Hurst Real Estate, INC4.987 Reviews
  • New to Real Estate · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2023 · 83 posts · 29 votes
    5mo

    I would probably look at it like this: if you did not already own it, would you buy it today at today’s value? That answer can tell you a lot.

  • Real Estate Agent · Memphis · Member since 2026 · 543 posts · 315 votes
    5mo

    You're not missing anything obvious, you're describing a property where the fundamentals have shifted from "hold" to "re-evaluate." 

    When appreciation is flat and fixed costs (taxes + insurance) are rising faster than rent, the deal starts relying entirely on cash flow to justify itself. If that's tightening or going negative, it's worth stepping back.

    A few things I’d look at before deciding:
    True cash flow today (after maintenance, CapEx, and rising insurance — not just mortgage vs rent)
    Forward pressure on expenses — if taxes/insurance continue trending up, what does this look like in 2–3 years?
    Rent ceiling in that market — is there actually room to offset those increases?
    Equity position + exit costs — what do you realistically walk away with if you sell?

    The part a lot of people overlook is opportunity cost. If the property is stable but not improving, the question becomes whether that equity performs better elsewhere. 

    There's nothing wrong with selling a property that no longer fits your criteria — especially if it's becoming more operationally demanding while offering less upside. 

    The only real reasons to hold in a scenario like this would be:
    • Strong confidence in future appreciation (which you’re not seeing)
    • Strategic reason to stay in that market
    • Or still hitting your return targets despite rising costs

    If none of those are there, it's less about "giving up" and more about reallocating. 

  • Investor · Milwaukee - Mequon, WI · Member since 2010 · 5k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    5mo

    It's hard to make 1 rental work. You lack the synergies you get from a portfolio and even if you cash flow a little, it will hardly make your life any better. And former primaries usually don't make good rentals anyway. Your quality of life is worth a lot more, feels like you should sell it.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.