Updated about 2 months ago on . Most recent reply
Seller Can't Deliver Vacant- WWYD?
Looking for advice here. (Cross posted for visibility)
We’re under agreement on a 2-family in Beverly, MA marketed as an “owner-occupied opportunity" with both units being TAW. We’re using owner-occupied financing, so vacant delivery at closing (5/19) was required and agreed to by the seller in a signed offer.
After going under contract, we found out the tenants are NOT TAW — they have leases through October, seller has no signed termination, and tenants won’t commit to leaving before their lease, but they're "looking".
We’ve already spent:
-$1,100 inspection, $600 appraisal, $1,000 deposit, plus time with contractors, lender, attorney, etc.
Seller’s response has basically been:
- -No clear relocation plan
- -Suggested terminating the deal, with refund of deposit
- -They even went as far as to change the listing to “future owner-occupied opportunity”.
Our Counter
We’re trying to salvage it:
- -Extend closing to 6/19
- -$5K price reduction to account for our extended rental costs
- -Keep $15K knob & tube credit
- -Require weekly updates
- -If not delivered vacant → we walk + get reimbursed (deposit, inspection, appraisal)
Questions
- Would you keep pushing on this or walk now?
- Is this too risky given MA tenant laws?
- Would you demand stronger protections (escrow holdback, bigger price cut, seller-funded cash-for-keys)?
Feels like the seller agreed to something they can’t actually deliver and have been unresponsive and sketchy to say the least. If it wasn't a good deal and a well maintained property, we would have walked already.
Curious how others would handle this.
Brian



