Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

90
Posts
36
Votes
Giuseppe Cavucci#2 Managing Your Property Contributor
  • online
36
Votes |
90
Posts

I started tracking every system's age vs. expected lifespan

Giuseppe Cavucci#2 Managing Your Property Contributor
  • online
Posted

For years I budgeted maintenance the same way most people do, a flat percentage of rent set aside "just in case." It felt responsible. It wasn't actually based on anything.

Last year I went through every unit and logged what I had: water heater install date, HVAC age, roof age, appliance ages, and lined them up against typical lifespans for each. Nothing fancy, just a spreadsheet.

What changed wasn't the total amount I was saving, it was the confidence in the number. I stopped being surprised. I knew the water heater in Unit 3 was on borrowed time two years before it actually failed, so when it did, it was a line item, not an emergency. I also realized I was over saving for the roof and under saving for HVAC, which a flat percentage would never have told me.

The uncomfortable part was realizing how much of my past "maintenance budget" was really just a guess dressed up as a plan. anyone else doing this at the individual system level, or is a blended percentage still working fine for your portfolio size? Genuinely curious where this stops being worth the effort.