Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

206
Posts
156
Votes
Ana Marie B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SF Bay Area, CA
156
Votes |
206
Posts

Interesting Anti-Landlord Ordinance Approved in Seattle

Ana Marie B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SF Bay Area, CA
Posted

Curious what others think of this new pro-renter ordinance approved in Seattle.  Would this make you think twice before investing in Seattle RE?

In a nutshell, this ordinance aims to ban "discrimination by landlords against renters with alternative sources of income, such as Social Security benefits, veteran’s benefits, unemployment insurance, child-support payments and other assistance programs. The ordinance also will require landlords to review applications one at a time, then pick the first renter who meets their screening criteria."

Here's the link:

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/...

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,096
Posts
944
Votes
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
944
Votes |
1,096
Posts
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
Replied

I don't have properties in that area.  But, IMO, the only two issues I have with the ordinance are 1) not being able to select the best tenant and 2) unemployment as a form of income.

Unemployment as a form of income is RIDICULOUS.  In most areas UE is 6 months, at the longest.  And that is 6 months if they are applying for an apartment right at the beginning of their UE.  What if there is only 1 month left anyway?  Come on. 

Do you know who also has to follow anti-discrimination laws?  Companies, for hiring and promotions.  Is there also a law in Seattle that companies need to hire the FIRST candidate with all of their requirements, instead of looking for the best qualified candidate?  I'm guessing the answer is a giant no.  So why would that same idea be different for LLs?  It shouldn't.  Also completely ridiculous.

  • Jennifer T.
  • Loading replies...

    1 2 3