Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Anne Johnson
  • Buy/Hold Investor
  • Tucson, AZ
1
Votes |
3
Posts

TransUnion Smartmove problems

Anne Johnson
  • Buy/Hold Investor
  • Tucson, AZ
Posted

I just screened a prospective tenant with Smartmove. Without sharing too much information, the report came back with "not enough information." The criminal report showed an incident from 25 years ago. Then I checked a popular social media source, and (conclusively) figured out that the individual was incarcerated for over a decade and recently released!! Apparently Smartmove can't get into federal cases, so the report missed a rather major detail. I called Smartmove and they said that the (federal) court doesn't give them any information. 

I am alarmed as my trust in Smartmove has been completely shattered, and now I wonder about the backgrounds of my other tenants who I screened with their service. I will now be changing to another screening provider. Has anyone else found similar issues with Smartmove or any other screening provider missing a very significant piece of background information?

Incidentally, the other tenants have mostly been fine (as far as I still know), and the person with the recent release seems to be viable as a tenant, so the decisions may not change, but missing this critical piece of information is an egregious omission.

Loading replies...