Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

105
Posts
22
Votes
Josh L.
  • Huntington Beach, CA
22
Votes |
105
Posts

What am I doing wrong when I reply to viewing requests?

Josh L.
  • Huntington Beach, CA
Posted

I started seriously posting to zillow and trulia and I keep getting the same message which I'm assuming is a automated request by people interested in the rental:

"I am interested in this rental and would like to schedule a viewing. Please let me know when this would be possible."

So I reply to this request with something along the lines like:

"Hi (their name),

I can schedule a viewing tomorrow. Will 6PM on Thursday work for you?"

Am I doing something wrong?

I throw out this time because I'm trying to set up a time so that I can bunch up all the viewings around the same time so I don't have to drive back and forth and to let the applicants see that there are other applicants interested too. 

And, I'm responding to the email within a few hours after the request and try to set a viewing for either tomorrow or that day if I have already have set up a viewing for that day. 

But, after I respond, most of the time I don't get a response back. Maybe, 1 in 4 will confirm that they would still like to schedule a viewing. 

Should I be responding in a different manner or something to get more people to follow through after their initial request? When they respond, their telephone is also given. Would calling them to schedule an appointment rather than replying via email make a difference?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

10,263
Posts
16,133
Votes
Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • East Wenatchee, WA
16,133
Votes |
10,263
Posts
Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • East Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Bill S.4) Do some pre-screening. I have a canned set of questions which I have people respond to before offering a showing.    Yes!  This is where it's at, Bill.  Well said.

With all the laws (maybe just here in WA) requiring us to screen applications in order received and emotional support/therapy/comfort/service animals and whatever else, my goal is definitely not to bring in every un-screened applicant I can. Open houses?  When can I see it? It it still available?  Over and over answering the same thing?  No way.  

My CL ads do not include addresses, just cross-streets.  Pics, but NO phone numbers.  I wouldn't be able to establish an elaborate phone tree if I had a month to do it lol.

They have pictures and a property description, followed by 5 important questions - like How many people?  How many animals?  Does anyone smoke?  How soon would you like to move?   If the questions aren't answered, they don't get a reply.  

You're going to end up with no free time and a family of 10 with 3 pit bulls.  Or the perfect applicant who can't move in for 3 months.  Pre-screen.  Free up your time and stay out of hot water with someone looking to be offended.  Cheers!

Loading replies...