Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
2
Votes
James Purcell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NYC
2
Votes |
11
Posts

Application Screening Requirements and Methods

James Purcell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NYC
Posted

Hello, I'm relatively new to BiggerPockets, and have read the book on property management by Brandon Turner. To add on to this discussion - when I was listening to the screening section of the aforementioned book this morning (for probably the fourth time), I noticed Brandon mentioned 'minimum screening standards' vs. 'minimum qualification standards' when speaking with PTs (potential tenants). If you find out a PT doesn't meet your 'minimum screening standards', and you don't want to show them the property, is that lawful as long as you allow them to fill out an application if they wish. I'm finding that, as Brandon mentioned in the book, most PTs won't pursue any further once you give them the minimum requirements, but then some do. Thoughts? I am just trying to save time where possible.

Also, just to make sure I have this right (and I have spoken with my attorney about this as well)  - I'm pretty much stuck with my application requirements once I start screening people, correct?  E.g. if I decide to change our policy/application to make pets negotiable after already having screened tenants, I would be putting myself at legal risk, correct?

Any help would be much appreciated!

Loading replies...