Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

162
Posts
50
Votes
Jared Baker
  • Hartford, WI
50
Votes |
162
Posts

Upper/Lower vs Side by Side Duplex

Jared Baker
  • Hartford, WI
Posted

Hi BP, I am wondering what peoples thoughts are on upper/lower vs side by side duplexes.  I grew up in a town that only had side by side duplexes and finding an upper/lower duplex was rare.  However, when I went to college, it was the exact opposite.  So with looking to possibly buy a duplex and I would like to know everyone's opinion.

  • What are the pros/cons of either property?
  • Is one more likely to bring better tenants?
  • Are rents different between the two or do they bring roughly the same amount if they are found in the same area?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,325
Posts
911
Votes
Antoine Martel
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Miami, FL
911
Votes |
2,325
Posts
Antoine Martel
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Miami, FL
Replied

Side by side in my opinion is better than upper lower because the tenants do not have to deal with noise the from the upstairs tenant bothering the lower tenant. 

But the benefit of the up down is that there is a smaller roof than a side by side. Therefore less capital expenditures over time. 

Loading replies...