Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

90
Posts
13
Votes
Joe Strickley
  • Santa Barbara, CA
13
Votes |
90
Posts

Hold Harmless Clause

Joe Strickley
  • Santa Barbara, CA
Posted

A property manager I want to use has a hold harmless clause in their management agreement. My understanding is this could potentially make me liable for their negligence. I have asked them to remove it but they won't. I've also asked my insurer if there any any issues, and am waiting for a reply. Anyone know is this is a problem, and if so is there a workaround/addendum wording?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

21,918
Posts
12,882
Votes
Bill Gulley#3 Guru, Book, & Course Reviews Contributor
  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator
  • Springfield, MO
12,882
Votes |
21,918
Posts
Bill Gulley#3 Guru, Book, & Course Reviews Contributor
  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator
  • Springfield, MO
Replied

Joe, it's best to spend a few bucks and get your attorney to look at it. They are treated differently from one area to another, judge to judge.

A hold harmless and indemnification agreement should be mutual to be most effective. For one side to require immunity and not allow the other side to have some balance is usually not successful, but can be depending on the nature of the agreement. It could be that the consideration for your releasing them of any liability is part of the consideration "paid" for their services, or that they will not provide such service under other conditions.

Regardless of what the indemnification agreement might say, they will still be held to a higher duty of care as a professional service and what is customarily required of the to act in a prudent business like manner. These gray areas need to be reviewed by an attorney familiar with such agreements in your area.

I know, because I have used them and have been saved by them as well as having them end up as worthless as the ink used to write them. A PM will be held to certain standards of conduct and care regardless of them screaming "it's not our fault"!

However they work well when subrogating against you for your negligence. If you did not make a repair they notified you about and someone gets hurt, the tenant might win against the PM (and you) but the PM will come after you for the loss suffered arising from the claims of that tenant or subrogate against you, that will probably fly right through with the full force and effect of the agreement, including reasonable attorney fees and costs of collection. Good luck....

Loading replies...