Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
1
Votes
Sahil Parmar
1
Votes |
7
Posts

2% Rule and applicability to CA

Sahil Parmar
Posted

All - Newbie here. And I am sure this has been discussed before. But how do experienced investors use the 1 or 2% rule to a market such as California? What are the typical rents you would expect (as a % of purchase price) considering the house appreciation is greater (and so are home prices so rents can rarely be 2% of the purchase)? Is 2% still possible in a market like this?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,139
Posts
5,017
Votes
Greg M.#2 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
5,017
Votes |
2,139
Posts
Greg M.#2 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

2% in California. 😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂 

I guess it is possible in some areas. After all, CA is massive. Perhaps the east side of the state that few people live in and places are fairly inexpensive. In the big cities and with current prices, you're closer to 0.40% on non-apartment buildings. 

Loading replies...