Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

30
Posts
25
Votes
Dakota Adney
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Tulsa, Ok
25
Votes |
30
Posts

Big Deals with partners or Small Deals alone?

Dakota Adney
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Tulsa, Ok
Posted

We often hear investors on the Bigger Pockets Podcast say they own 1,200 units, 2,000 units, 15,000 units etc. In most cases where the unit counts are this large, these units are owned as part of a syndication or fund, meaning they retained ownership/control of “a percentage of 1,200 units” (and in many cases, I think these claims should be clarified, but I'll save that for another day...). 

My question for the BP community is:

By taking fractional ownership of a large deal (let’s say 10% of a 100-unit deal), and sharing the deal with partners, you are in a sense truly “owning” 10 units. In other words, you're reaping the benefits of an equivalent of 10 units. Is there a benefit to this over just purchasing 10 units without partners (either single family or small multifamily) alone, with 100% ownership? Wouldn't the cash flow, principle paydown, and appreciation be similar, just spread out over more deals? Wouldn't you have the same amount of equity invested/created, just spread out over 10 small deals instead of 1 large deal? Am I forgetting an important piece of this puzzle?

I would love to hear from investors who have done BOTH small deals and large deals to see how they weigh the pros and cons.


Why I'm asking: 

I'm new to investing with less than 12 units. I feel the urge to partner with other investors and purchase a larger deal (something like an 8-16 unit) to scale faster. But I've played around with the numbers, and it seems like I would get the same return by just buying more units alone, and not giving up any control of those units (the ability to sell, re-fi, renovate, etc. without needing permission from partners).

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,840
Posts
2,019
Votes
Scott M.
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Rochester Hills, MI
2,019
Votes |
2,840
Posts
Scott M.
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Rochester Hills, MI
Replied

Different for everyone including you.  Owning a tiny share of 15,000 units is like owning a stock.  You are not really involved.  You are not really an active participant.  So if 100% passive and investment backed up by real estate is your thing and you don't want to ever get dirty, get your hands involved etc a great way to go.

Or you can do it 100% yourself and own the whole thing.  Make all the decision.  Live and die by them.

Or you can go in the middle like @Taylor L. said and have a few partners where each of you bring something to the table and you get to do what you love and avoid what you hate.  

Your choice.  

Loading replies...