Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

4
Posts
4
Votes
Jen Loch
4
Votes |
4
Posts

Accelerated depreciation for first rental

Jen Loch
Posted

Hi. Looking at my first str! I understand land is excluded from the cost segregation study and that an easy estimate is 20% of purchase price. I’m confused on why some properties result in 20% and others 40%… are there characteristics to look for to get higher amounts

if you renovate after, would it make sense to do cost seg study after Reno or before and then do the individual Reno items as separate deductions?


thanks for any ideas!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

8,477
Posts
10,351
Votes
Bill B.#3 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
10,351
Votes |
8,477
Posts
Bill B.#3 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
Replied

If you own a condo in a high rise you own zero land. 
if you own a 400sf shack on Lake Tahoe you own 100% land. 

Remember, you aren’t creating ANY tax deductions. You are only pulling them forward to have fewer deductions in the future. And if you ever sell they get paid back. So make sure you think your income and taxes will be lower in the future. 

Your CPA should answer the before / after Reno, and maybe even if it’s worth doing if they’re any good. Your cost segregation company or your CPA or both will have to come to an agreement on what percent the land is. There is NO standard percent rule. 

Loading replies...