AZ Legislation Stops Cities From Banning Short-Term Rentals

AZ Legislation Stops Cities From Banning Short-Term Rentals

Rental Property Investor · Phoenix AZ / Kendallville, IN · Member since 2016 · 293 posts · 149 votes

This is old news but just came across it. Not sure if its good for the communities but it seems good for the investors.

On May 13, 2016, Governor Doug Ducey signed into law SB 1350, which prohibits municipalities from banning the listing and use of short-term rentals. 1

Prior to SB 1350, short-term rentals were essentially “flying under the radar” in most areas of the Valley, including Scottsdale, which prohibited less than 30 day rentals. Despite city ordinances, online services such as AirBnB, VRBO, HomeAway, and others were displaying hundreds to thousands of listings of this type on their sites. The use of these sites not only placed homeowners in violation of the law, but also created an unfair playing field for the hotel industry where they are required to collect and remit additional taxes related to short-term lodging. This piece of legislation takes away the controversy as to whether private property owners are allowed to rent out their home, as they see fit, on a short-term basis. Additionally, now a city, town, or other taxing jurisdiction can more effectively levy and collect a transaction privilege, sales, use or similar tax/fee (in Scottsdale, this is commonly referred to as the “Bed Tax”) in relation to what is considered transient lodging (rentals of less than 30 days). This translates to more revenue for communities, which is a positive outcome of this change.

Historically, federal and state laws are designed to protect and defend the rights of property owners to use their property as they see fit. Currently in our area, we see many owners using their primary and vacation homes as a short-term rental to offset their costs. This legislation strikes a balance to allow for more flexibility in the use of one’s home and restores private property rights to owners who wish to take advantage of this type of rental income.

What does SB 1350 do?

  • Prohibits a city, town or county from restricting the use or regulation of vacation rentals and short-term rentals.
  • Allows the local government to determine regulations governing vacation and short-term rentals if the regulation is meant to protect public health and safety.
  • Provides a mechanism to collect rental taxes and remit to the Arizona Department of Revenue.
  • Creates more economic opportunity and inclusiveness, while protecting the private property rights of the homeowner.
  • What does SB 1350 NOT do?

  • Prohibit Homeowner Association’s (HOAs) from banning the practice of vacation rentals and short-term rentals within their community.
  • What does this actually mean for homeowners living within an HOA? It means, if an HOA’s CC&R’s prohibit or restrict the rental of a member or unit owner’s property, then the property may not be rented without complying with the restrictions. If the CC&R’s currently do not restrict the rental of property2 and the HOA seeks to amend its CC&R’s to include such provisions, they may do so, but it will require a statutorily higher vote count of the unit owners.3

    See information sources:

    1Senate Bill 1350: Online Lodging; Administration; Definitions2A.R.S. 33-1260.01. Rental property; unit owner and agent information; fee; disclosure3A.R.S. 33-1227. Amendment of declaration

    To Rent or Not to Rent – That is the Question

    Short Term Vacation Rentals – Hot Legislative Topic Across the Country

    4Reply
    29 views

    9 Replies

    Jump to latestLatest
    • Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2016 · 565 posts · 391 votes
      9y

      seems a great and advanced approach !  Wish California would do the same . 

    • Palmdale, CA · Member since 2016 · 1 post · 0 votes
      9y

      What  is California's status?? 

    • James CarlsonPro Member
      Real Estate Agent · Colorado | stan.store/JamesCarlson · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
      9y

      I know that @Michael Greenberg has a few properties in Scottsdale and was telling me about this. I wonder what the "statutorily higher vote count" means for HOAs that want to amend their declarations to restrict Airbnb and other short-term rentals.

    • James CarlsonPro Member
      Real Estate Agent · Colorado | stan.store/JamesCarlson · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
      9y

      Hey @Kurt K. I know that @Michael Greenberg has a few properties in Scottsdale and was telling me about this. I wonder what the "statutorily higher vote count" means for HOAs that want to amend their declarations to restrict Airbnb and other short-term rentals.

    • James CarlsonPro Member
      Real Estate Agent · Colorado | stan.store/JamesCarlson · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
      9y

      Sorry for the double post.

    • Investor · Denver, CO · Member since 2016 · 533 posts · 433 votes
      9y

      Yes I do and my properties do have HOA's with varying degrees of acceptance but will have a terrible time getting the CC&R's changed to prohibit them because AZ's economy is very reliant upon tourism. My locations have numerous VR's in them so it will likely not pass a vote for change. That said, there is still a potential threat but it's a risk I'm willing to live with for the time being.

      @Kurt K. @James Carlson

    • James CarlsonPro Member
      Real Estate Agent · Colorado | stan.store/JamesCarlson · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
      9y

      @Michael Greenberg. It's totally worth the risk, you're right. And if you bought using long-term rent numbers in your calculation, then you can do STRs as long as allowable and still have the cushion to go long-term if the impossible happens and the HOA changes their decs.

      @Kurt K.

    • Developer · AZ · Member since 2014 · 77 posts · 60 votes
      9y

      I am up north in Sedona and have an STR here. Own owner association in particular moved quickly to amend its CCRs to ban rentals less than 30 days. There will be a lot legal fights related to SB1350 from both sides yet to come in AZ........

    • Rental Property Investor · Phoenix AZ / Kendallville, IN · Member since 2016 · 293 posts · 149 votes
      9y

      @Brian T. Grooms It should be interesting how this plays out. I agree, there are going to be some lawsuits.

    Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.