Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on .

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Maggie Eriksson
  • Hollywood, FL
0
Votes |
1
Posts

CFR Sec 8 portability question

Maggie Eriksson
  • Hollywood, FL
Posted

If a tenant transferring to another H.A. has not found an apartment by the date his first apt.  must be vacated and becomes a hold-over tenant with an extension to look for an apartment in the new jurisdiction, can the first H.A. terminate the tenant and refuse to pay the additional month H.A. share - forcing the tenant into homelessness for a month? In this case, the second H.A. will not be assimilating the tenant; the previous H.A. will be billed. THIS QUESTION IS URGENT. PLEASE GIVE ME CFR CITATION.